Responding to an NPC is not futile, as there are often countless silent lurkers reading your posts. Here are some responses to common attacks to the Q movement.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 HANDY RED PILL 💊
You don't have to yell to make an irrelevant point. You, on the other hand, are blind to my points. You don't address them at all, as though by not doing so you can pretend they didn't exist. Well, too bad. Those are the objections I have and since you have no interest in countering them, I feel justified in maintaining them. It is pretty clear that when (1) you have no response, and (2) you resort to verbal abuse, you have lost the argument.
You are the one saying that there’s nothing wrong with Albert Pike and that Freemasons don’t worship Lucifer on those levels. But how them do you contend with this quote from Morals and Dogma?
LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darknesss! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual or selfish Souls ? Doubt it not!
What is there to contend with? Who wrote it? What does it mean to whom? I'm just saying there is nothing wrong with George Washington. Or do you disagree?
Albert Pike wrote it - it’s from his book MORALS AND DOGMA. It’s on the front page.
Also there have been 33rd Degree Masonic whistleblowers who have attested to it and also infiltrators who have disclosed it.
Also, if you believe that there exists such a group of people in this world who do worship Lucifer and who do kill and even eat babies and that they are elites of our society then you must have at least a suspicion of Freemasonry.
The Grandmaster of the lodge of England is royalty. George Washington was a Freemason. The city built in his name is a topographical and architectural homage to Freemasonry. Or do these elites somehow escape the finger of suspicion because you have a preconception of Washington as a hero, in accordance with the historical narrative peddled by the very same people?
I did look up the book and read what reviews I could find. Sounds too much of an investment in time and patience (over 800 pages of dense, 19th-century prose). The general thrust of the reviews is that this is kind of a Rorschach blot, with more to be read into it than from it. Nobody brought up any problem with Luciferianism, and I am suspicious that such a claim might be a libel.
All we are left with is you don't like Albert Pike and Trump didn't want his statue demolished. I don't see these positions as being contradictory, since we don't have Trump's argument on the subject.
Was Washington not a hero?