![](https://media.greatawakening.win/preview/15JnBLYwmE.png)
WELCOME, NEWCOMERS! With GEOTUS now taking Q public, we have lots of new faces here on GAW! The mod team has condensed the sidebar into this handy Venn diagram. Moon hoaxers, chemtards, and flat chester's are not allowed. Why? 1) its not on Q, and 2) this is GAW, not AM Coast to Coast! Have FUN! 🐸
(media.greatawakening.win)
🌎 WELCOME! 🌍
![](https://media.greatawakening.win/post/9dzqBxHjJS8u.jpeg)
Stop the condescension. I understand how humidity works. My retort still stands with car exhaust. The same "scientific" principles should work both with cars and planes, yes? Or is there a different "science" for each? Must be a different humidity for planes?
Riddle me this, Mr Science:
How is it, on the same day - and at the same time - one can see two similar planes flying at roughly the same altitude, one plane leaves a long, never dissipating trail, while the other plane leaves a trail that disappears almost immediately?
You're comparing two totally different things. Planes flying at 40,000 feet are flying in air temperatures around -70F. The jet engine exhaust is between 1,200-1,400F. That's quite a big difference in temperature. It takes a long time for the jet exhaust to reach the ambient air temperature at 40,000 feet, hence why it lingers and takes awhile to dissipate.
Car exhaust is about 400F...and obviously our ambient air temperature at ground level is nowhere near -70F. Have you ever seen car exhaust on a hot day? Not likely.
As for 2 planes flying at "roughly" same altitude and one emitting contrail and one not...again, humidity can be completely different even if flying at 1,000 feet difference. There are so many variables that would effect this to make the difference. Show me a video or some irrefutable evidence of this exact scenario - 2 planes, same altitude, same airplane make/model, same flying speed, in same geographic area, one with contrail, one without, and I'll consider it.
I won't even go into the jet fuel issues with your thoughts on "chemtrails". Do you really think they are manipulating jet fuel by putting chemicals in it to create these "chemtrails"? Do you even have a slight understanding how difficult it would be to do this? A combustion engine would completely change the added chemicals before going out the exhaust. Jef fuel burns at 3,000F.
Try not to address issues I don't bring up.
Thank you for at least being open to contrary evidence.
From the tone of your rebuttals, I have to ask: Are you arguing that Chemtrails are completely fake and gay?
Still waiting on the contrary evidence that "chemtrails" are legit and real. And yes, I'm arguing that chemtrails are not a thing. Is cloud seeding legit...yes. Is cloud seeding the same as what you call "chemtrails"? No. Cloud seeding involves sprayers - do you see sprayers on the airplanes that are producing these "chemtrails" you speak of?
So, I guess this vintage photograph of a Boeing WWII plane is producing "chemtrails"? I guess they have doing this since the first flights took air.
WWII plane with contrails
Question for you - if "chemtrails" were real, why would they make it visible to us? So we can actually see what they are doing to us? Wouldn't you think if they were trying to kill us with chemicals in the air, they would make it non-visible, so we are clueless? There's much easier ways to kill off people without us knowing....maybe contaminating drinking water with a colorless, odorless chemical? But, taking the time to put the chemicals into the jet fuel and spread it at 40,000 ft. Come on...that's absurd.
Also, who is the target of these "chemtrails"? Is it all of the World's population? Who is behind it? And, why would they do that? That means even those at the highest level of corruption (i.e. Deep State) would still be exposed to it? It literally make zero sense.