Who is Candace's husband...?
You need to attend Notice Therapy
Hmmm...we already know the left has no problem tattling on fellow Americans (think the Plandemic). Could this be conditioning the conservative right to tattle on each other?
Israel is not a piece of land bought and stolen by the Rothschilds....
Did this occur outside of God's sovereignty?
Consider King Cyrus (a gentile) allowing the captive choos to return to their land,,,
And Helena Blavatsky (and a little later Alice Baily) laid out the plan before that.
Externalizing the Hierarchy. Making war with Yahweh and eliminating the choos.
After reading all the comments on this post, I have something to say.
Ya'll ever notice how every “truth movement” somehow ends up pointing at Israel like it’s the final boss of evil? 👀 Funny how the Great Awakening crowd thinks they’re exposing the NWO when really they’re just being set up to fulfill prophecy without even knowing it.
The Bible already warned us this would happen...Jerusalem becomes the scapegoat, and the nations rise up thinking they're doing humanity a favor. But the real twist? They're playing right into the beast’s hands, rallying under a false light against the harlot (Jerusalem), just like Revelation said.
The irony? The same crowd screaming “we’re waking up!” is marching in lockstep with a Gnostic rebellion that’s been around since Eden. Deceiving even the elect, if possible. (Matthew 24:24)
So before we all go full pitchfork, maybe pause and ask - are we fighting the real enemy, or are we just another pawn on Satan’s chessboard?
Don’t get played. ⚔️ #TestTheSpirits
Good questions!
Totally get where you're coming from... but just curious - if there’s no singular Antichrist, how do you reconcile passages like 2 Thessalonians 2 where Paul talks about “the man of lawlessness” being revealed? That sure sounds like an individual figure, not just a system. Revelation isn't meant to be read carnally, agreed - but it is meant to be read contextually. Ignoring the plain grammatical-historical reading can lead us just as far off as over-literalizing symbols.
Just some food for thought 🍽👀
Yep. That “peace” that’s coming? Totally fake.
It’s the calm before the storm - built by a counterfeit kingdom that looks like light but ain’t from God. It’s gonna feel like unity, revival, progress... but it’s all a setup 😶
Then boom...destruction. Just like 1 Thess 5:3 says.
Don’t fall for the vibe. Stay sharp. It’s all unfolding 💥
I’ve spent a lot of time watching and praying over this Great Awakening movement, and I know many here deeply respect Kim Clement. I get it...he was passionate, charismatic, and said things that seemed to line up with what we’re seeing now. But I’ve started to ask myself some hard questions, not to tear anyone down, but to make sure I'm staying grounded in truth.
When Kim spoke of “taking the Kingdom by force,” I couldn’t help but think of how that mindset, though bold, aligns more with a dominion theology that assumes we usher in the Kingdom through power and influence. But Jesus said His Kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36). And the establishment of His kingdom comes at Christ's return - not before. The danger comes when movements blur the line between spiritual truth and worldly agendas, wrapping it all in the name of God.
I’m not here to attack Kim or anyone who follows his teachings. But I do want to challenge all of us - myself included - to test everything (1 Thess. 5:21). Could it be that some prophetic voices, while sounding right, are actually leading us toward a false unity or a counterfeit Kingdom that looks like light but isn’t from God?
I'm sharing this out of concern, not criticism. Deception in the last days won’t look like obvious evil...it’ll look like righteousness, power, and unity… but without the cross, without repentance, and without the Spirit of truth.
Let’s stay watchful, prayerful, and rooted in Scripture. There’s a lot more at stake than politics or platforms.
Called on Congress??
Pfft...they're probably in on it.
Totally agree God’s in control.... nothing slips past Him.
But just cuz He allows something doesn’t mean it’s from Him. 👀 Sometimes He lets people chase lies to reveal what’s really in their hearts (2 Thess 2:11 style).
Not everything that fights “evil” is good. The enemy’s slick - 2 Cor 11:14 says he shows up like an angel of light, not with horns and pitchforks. So if something feels like truth but it’s not leading to repentance or the real gospel… might be bait.
God can use anything, but that doesn’t mean we trust everything. Test the spirits (1 John 4:1).
Just sayin'… even the Beast shows up looking like a lamb (Rev 13:11). 😬
Ya feel me?
Boy, seemed to me like Trump was very reserved and calculated answering that question.
Totally get where you're coming from...and you're dead on with Matthew 12. Satan doesn’t fight himself. If evil’s exposing evil, it’s probably not falling apart... it’s staging a show.
So lemme throw this out there - what if Satan's not just controlling the “bad guys,” but also the good guys? Like, what if he’s playing both sides of the board, making folks think they’re waking up and winning... when really, they’re just walking right into his trap?
I mean, think about it. If he can’t trick people with darkness, he’ll use a fake light. 2 Corinthians 11:14 says it straight - he shows up like an angel of light. Not horns and pitchforks, but hope, truth, “freedom.”
So maybe all this "exposing" isn't the system falling - it’s bait. A setup. The Beast comes after the Harlot falls, not before. So the fake kingdom of God rises, but it’s built on outrage and pride, not repentance and truth.
Q, patriots, great awakening... could all just be a smoke screen. False light to lead the world right into the Beast’s arms.
Wild, huh? 😬 Ya see what I'm sayin?
That’s a legit observation, and I love that you’re digging into the text that closely. Psalm 110 definitely shows a distinction between Yahweh and the Messiah - no doubt. But here’s where it gets wild… and beautifully deep:
You're absolutely right: Yahweh speaks to Adonai - and Jesus points out that Adonai (David’s Lord) is Him.
So now we have two divine persons in the same scene - and here’s the key: This doesn't deny that Jesus is Yahweh… it actually forces us into the framework of the Trinity.
Let me unpack that real quick:
1️⃣ Psalm 110 shows two divine figures - not a human and God, but YHWH speaking to Adonai, who sits at His right hand, shares His rule, and executes His judgment. 👉 That right there is unheard of in strict monotheism - unless you have one divine essence in multiple persons.
2️⃣ In the NT, Jesus doesn’t say, “See, I’m not Yahweh.” He uses it to stump the Pharisees on how David could call his descendant “Lord.” → Their theology had no room for a Messiah who is both David’s son and David’s Lord - but the Incarnation solves that!
3️⃣ Jesus can be “David’s Lord” (Adonai) and also Yahweh -
Because within the Trinity:
The Father is Yahweh
The Son is Yahweh
The Spirit is Yahweh
But the Father is not the Son, and the Son is not the Spirit - they are distinct persons, but one God.
So when Jesus is at Yahweh’s right hand, it’s not Jesus sitting next to a different God - It’s the Son seated next to the Father - both fully Yahweh, both fully divine, distinct in person, united in essence.
It’s deep stuff, but that’s exactly what Psalm 110 opens the door to: Not a denial of Jesus being Yahweh - but a glimpse into the complex unity of who God really is. 🔥
Let me know if you want to go further into the Hebrew or how the early church handled this one.
😂 Love it. Alright then, buckle up - here’s a quick visual tour of the Trinity in the Old Testament:
🔁 Genesis 1:1–3 - The Triune God in Creation
“In the beginning God created… and the Spirit of God was hovering… and God said…”
You’ve got:
-
God the Father creating
-
The Spirit hovering
-
The Word (spoken command) - and we know from John 1:1–3 that the Word is the Son
Boom - all three right there at the start. 🧨
🤝 Genesis 1:26
“Then God said, ‘Let us make mankind in our image…’”
Plural pronouns. Not angels - we’re not made in their image. This is divine counsel within the Godhead. ✨
🔥 Isaiah 48:16
“And now the Sovereign Lord has sent me, endowed with his Spirit.”
Who’s speaking? The Servant (the Messiah). So you’ve got:
-
The Father (Sovereign Lord)
-
The Son (the one sent)
-
The Spirit
Clear as day if you're looking through the Trinitarian lens. 👀
👑 Psalm 110:1
“The Lord says to my Lord: Sit at my right hand…”
David hears Yahweh speaking to another divine figure. Jesus Himself uses this in Matthew 22:44 to show that David’s “Lord” is none other than the Messiah - i.e., Jesus. 🙌
💨 Numbers 11:25 & Isaiah 63:10–11
The Spirit shows up often - not as a force, but as a person who can be grieved (Isa. 63:10) and who empowers leaders (Num. 11:25). Not just an energy - a divine someone. 💡
So yeah… the Trinity is not just a New Testament idea. It’s baked into the story from Genesis onward - just waiting to be revealed in full through Jesus. 🔥🔥🔥
Totally get it - this is one of those mind-blowing moments 🔥
Yes, Jesus is the Son of God - but He’s also one in essence with the Father. That’s why He says things like, “I and the Father are one” (John 10:30). So we’re not saying the Son is the Father - we’re saying Father, Son, and Spirit are all Yahweh, the one true God.
Now to your question: Are there references to the Father in the OT? Yep - but they’re fewer and more subtle compared to how Jesus reveals the Father in the NT.
Here are a few solid examples:
1️⃣ Deuteronomy 32:6
“Is this the way you repay the Lord, you foolish and unwise people? Is he not your Father, your Creator, who made you and formed you?”
2️⃣ Isaiah 63:16
“But you are our Father, though Abraham does not know us... You, Lord, are our Father, our Redeemer from of old is your name.”
3️⃣ Malachi 2:10
“Do we not all have one Father? Did not one God create us?”
It’s all there - just not as fully unpacked until Jesus shows up and makes it crystal clear. The OT points to it, the NT explodes with it.
Let me know if you want a quick visual on how the Trinity shows up in the OT too - it’s wild. 👀
I've been tagged and coming in late to this exchange, so forgive me if this was already covered. If so, then just ignore me!
But the fastest way to wreck the Gnostic claim that Yahweh = evil and separate from Jesus? 🧱👊
👇 Just walk through this:
1️⃣ Jesus = Yahweh
"Before Abraham was born, I AM" (John 8:58). That’s a direct mic-drop from Exodus 3:14. The crowd picked up stones - they knew exactly what He meant. 🔥
2️⃣ OT Yahweh quotes applied to Jesus
Joel 2:32 → "Everyone who calls on the name of Yahweh will be saved." Paul quotes it in Romans 10:13 - but now it’s about JESUS. No split. No dual gods. Same LORD. 🙌
3️⃣ Jesus LOVED the OT
Called it “the Word of God” (Mark 7:13). Said “Scripture can’t be broken” (John 10:35). If Yahweh was some evil knockoff deity, why’s Jesus quoting Him nonstop?
4️⃣ Early Church wasn’t playing
Also, Irenaeus clapped back hard against Gnostic theology in Against Heresies - the God who created is the same one who saves. End of story. ✝️
So nah, Jesus ain’t correcting Yahweh. He IS Yahweh. And the whole Bible backs it. 📖💯
I never really understood what Q meant by this. There's so much in the Bible to compare with.
Yeah, this was OBVIOUSLY faked.
The question is, "Why fake this if we can do it for real?"
What are the implications here for the Q movement being run from that platform?
You know the accusations are coming...
I've always said that One Hit Wonders never drank the blood.