Sauce? Sauce??? SAUCE?!?!?!!
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
Uh bullshit, I want to review sources. I'm not trusting anyone I don't know right off the bat because they said so. If you can't provide some sources of any kind of something you've been studying for "so long" you're probably nothing but a LARP.
If your sources have contradictory evidence, I want to debate it.
If your sources mean I'm wrong about something, I want to know it.
Also if that person is an actual expert, they may be able to provide better sources than what your bastardized censored search engines of Google or Duckduckgo can provide in a quick search.
really depends on the person you're talking to. i've shown things similar to what you linked below to some people, and they'll just dismiss it or not read it. sometimes they've told me that the below is far-right wing propaganda. never has anyone read & contemplated and continued a fruitful discussion. it's all quick, emotion-based rhetoric. if they're primed to reject a thesis they'll never agree with any source to show otherwise.
the people the meme targets are the ones who wanna be spoon fed answers and think that everything in this world is orderly and fits in neat little boxes. they'll also gladly watch hours of garbage on netflix but complain about being asked to watch a 30min lecture or documentary because "it's too long".
and when things like vaccine damage, inflation, the trans agenda start becoming too big to ignore they are surprised every time and wonder how these things could've happened.
It doesn't matter what this meme is targeted to. You should always be willing to back up your statements with sources for others to see. To argue for the opposite is to invite the stupidest of the human to confidently strut around like they know everything and we get a shit hole like Twitter.
If they don't accept the answer, that's on them but those lurking should be given a chance to learn and grow.
Of course. I've just had my fair of time trying to talk to people irl who I thought would be willing to, but they've all regressed so I'm currently a bit jaded. People on these boards, definitely there is more hope.
I have no idea, and did not notice til you just pointed that out. I only opened this account about a year ago.
Edit: Ah I get it now. 11M is "11 Months"
Ok, I'll edit that out then. Apologies for that..
Yes, usually people on here are those that seek their own answers rather than having it spoonfed to them.
Prove viruses exist, per Kochs Postulates.
Please don’t try to claim Koch’s Postulates are a quaint throwback to a less advanced society.
Here's pictures of viruses under an electron microscope. You can see it with your own eyes.
https://microspedia.blogspot.com/2017/09/real-electron-microscope-virus-photo.html
Are you a glowie trying to implant stupid shit like Flat Earth Theory into GAW? Do you expect me to move an Electron Microscope to your dumbass house so that you actually believe what you see?
Are you being padded with upvotes by other 3 letter agency accounts because honestly people can't be this stupid, right?
Koch's postulates are the following:
The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms.
The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.
The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism.
The microorganism must be reisolated from the inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific causative agent.
Point 0. Viruses are not considered an organism or microorganism and therefore wouldn't even apply to Kochs postulates. They do not meet the criteria for life but they are like floating DNA strands that may have previously evolved from life and now stick their DNA in to microorganisms to reproduce and function. They have no metabolism which is a requirement of life.
https://www.quora.com/I-read-that-organisms-must-meet-four-criteria-to-be-considered-living-What-are-the-four-criteria?share=1
CULTIVATION OF VIRUSES – HOW DO VIRUSES GROW IN LABORATORY?
https://paramedicsworld.com/virology-notes/cultivation-of-viruses/medical-paramedical-studynotes
⇒ Viruses are the obligate intracellular parasites, i.e. they strictly require a living host or living cells for the growth and multiplication, so they cannot be grown on an inanimate culture medium.
⇒ Three methods are employed for the cultivation of viruses:-
Yes. This is what will happen. If you get bitten with an abundance of Rabies virus in the bite, you will die.
[RARE] Rabies in a human
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-moG6JDmJdc
If you don't get rabies virus you won't die of rabies.
Rabies virus picture
https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5041/5279807113_13ee17ca3f_b.jpg
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Electron-micrograph-of-rabies-virus-particles-from-a-vaccine-preparation-Bar-200-nm_fig2_230664321
MECHANISMS OF TRANSMISSION OF RHINOVIRUS INFECTIONS
https://booksc.org/dl/68694063/29f074
Proposed Mechanism of Action and Rationale for Ivermectin Use in Patients With COVID-19
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/
Reports from in vitro studies suggest that ivermectin acts by inhibiting host importin alpha/beta-1 nuclear transport proteins, which are part of a key intracellular transport process.3,4 Viruses hijack the process and enhance infection by suppressing the host’s antiviral response. In addition, ivermectin docking may interfere with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein attachment to the human cell membrane.5 Some studies of ivermectin have also reported potential anti-inflammatory properties, which have been postulated to be beneficial in people with COVID-19.6-8
Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.9
The safety and efficacy of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 have been evaluated in clinical trials and observational cohorts. Summaries of the studies that informed The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel’s (the Panel) recommendation can be found in Table 4c.
I hope I remember your user name next time I run into another “virus arent real, prove me wrong” person. Of all the things banned on GAW for being “fringe” and non-q related I'm not sure why this topic isn’t included if we’re “concerned about all these new normies coming on to our website who might see something unpalatable”