The COPE is hard for all the Q haters since @KASH signed 10 books with “WWG1WGA”. You know what to do…
(media.greatawakening.win)
❄️ AMERO-C-C-C-CUCKS❄️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (115)
sorted by:
Actions, which are words in this case, speak loudly. I'm not sure how Tucker would be controlled oppo. Sure, he has a contract and he has to abide by that. But there seems to be few limits as to what he will/wont talk about. If he is controlled, I'm waiting on the play. The only one I see at this point is Trump openly links himself to Q for normies and sheep and the MSM flips, and then Tucker calls Trump crazy. Anything short of Q-denial has been working in our side's favor.
His failure to seriously address the election fraud early was egregious, and definitely soured me on him. I'm sure that's somehow included in his contract, but that was a big tell. That, and his desire to be CIA in college.
That said, the verdict still still out on him for me. I want to believe he's legit. And I'm ready to be hurt again
I met him, looked into his eyes, shook his hand. I'm a good judge of character and he is just as real on the street as he is on TV. I get the CIA thing (I wanted to join too), but not a dealbreaker - there are good people at Langley still. The election thing could easily have been contractual given Fox's role in the steal coverup.
I did talk with him about Pizzagate which was pretty established at that point, just after the start of Q. He told me he had been there multiple times (blocks from his house) and never noticed anything unusual. Then again, 7 years ago, I wouldn't have noticed anything unusual. In pre-Trump America, the MSM, Pols, and behind the scene guys/gals all got along at the local watering holes. Similar argument could be made for pre-Hussein as well. That's how he knew Hunter - they were neighbors and saw each other on the block (Conn Ave NW). Notice he has now gone after HB with a vengeance.
You make a smart decision - verdict still out. As a former analyst, I mentally assign confidence ratings to people. I'm maintaining Tucker at 80% positive confidence.
He's friends with and covered for Hunter Biden. He frequented Comet Ping Pong. He denied election fraud. His faux outrage is annoying as fuck. He's a CIA farmboy and while he may speak some truths now, it's definitely controlled. He's not breaking any news - he doesn't report until he's given the green light because the information is already out there. Fox is garbage. He just spoke at a Hell's Angels memorial event, FFS.
I appreciate your response. You've addressed just about every concern I have with Tucker. I haven't met him. It's much harder to fake authenticity in person than it is over the airwaves. And if you're a former analyst, I'm willing to bet you've met some very, very slick liars.
Heartily agree with your assessment, and means of doing so. It's one thing to listen to a person on TV or radio. It's another thing to interface directly with them. I usually reserve my opinion on someone I have met, until after we have enjoyed a meal and I have had the opportunity to watch them, as they talk. Sincerity is difficult to fake, and maintain that façade, for any length of time.
IMHO, if someone passes the personal impression test; if they are wrong, almost in every situation, they had reason to believe that that they were telling me, was the truth at that point in time. We are all wrong, from time to time. It seems that a liar, will generally give himself away within a few minutes, where the honestly sincere person (even if he is passing on bad information), will not.
Thus far, I have not seen Tucker give much bad information, intentionally.
. .
I cannot shake the feeling that something happened to Tucker when he had Tony Bobolinski on his show. His mail was intercepted on the way to CA where he was shooting. I think he was seriously threatened/scared. He pulled away from any serious reporting for a long time. He just started dropping occasional red pills in the last few months. It makes me think that a threat/threats has/have been removed.
Bingo. There is a reason he lives on an island in FL now.
While I haven't personally met blacksmith21, he and I shared a few off-board comms a couple years ago when he still lived in the DC area not far from me. He didn't say much in our interactions, but what he did share was always truthful, sincere and logical. He's probably the only "online" contact whom I trust implicitly...and I trust what he says on this topic. I follow what he says closely...for good reason.
Thank you, I appreciate that. Custodes Vero. Guardians of the Truth.
Here's another nugget - I met a recently retired USSS agent from NoVA at a college parent's weekend. He spent 2 years on the road with Bongino and said he's the most honest, straight shooter he's met. He said his schtick on the radio is 100% Bongino. NY style. I did ask if he has had any recent contact with him and he had not. My question centering Bongino's health. I still don't think he is out of the woods TBH.
I admit that we still watch 15min Tucker/Waters segments at home, but I never forgave him for not calling out the stolen election back when he could have made a difference.
If he had called out the stolen election then, we might not be where we are today.
"It had to be this way."
https://qalerts.app/?q=it+had+to+be+this+way
I totally understand, “It had to be this way.” I never doomed because I understand the big picture/end game; in generalities of course.
Not talking about a subject does not mean he's not on our side. I hear people say this stuff all the time..oh Tucker didn't talk about the stolen election..but he's had on guests that know the election was stolen. Then the audience goes to these guest's websites and find the election fraud truth there.
Tucker probably is not allowed to talk about it directly or he'll just be replaced with an actual talking head and guess what all the Fox normies get then? Right..NO TRUTH WHATSOEVER.
Tucker covers a lot of stuff others on Fox won't even touch..Hunter's Laptop, for instance.
I really can't think of anything major that Tucker has talked about that I actually disagree with. So until that happens..I'll take what I can get from him.
You are absolutely right that he would be replaced with someone more compliant and less likeable and I don’t hate Tucker. I was just really disappointed because I expected better from him. I would like to think that he was forbidden to push the topic, but like another poster said! “I am also ready to be disappointed.” (by him) That doesn’t mean I’ll quit watching his segments. Some are actually quite good.
My wife & I like to watch him & Watters to see what the majority of the people in the conservative mainstream are getting from their only MAJOR news source so we better understand what the average Joe is going to be aware of. He has an enormous audience of people who trust him. Boomers are still going to flock to Hannity but younger folks could have benefited his insight.
Sometimes it is difficult to be awake to so many things for so long while watching everyone around me float through life oblivious. Not dooming; just frustrated.