I've seen a lot of Anons not point out the biggest, NUMBER 1, reason why Q is widely considered legitimate. It's because of the Post Deltas. Not the year-long deltas, mind you...
This will just be a quick breakdown of the facts.
How do we know Q is legitimate?
Well, let's look at the above data and draw some conclusions...
How can we prove that Trump and Q were/are knowingly coordinating posts?
Well, what if Q posts and then Trump Tweets, over and over again?
That's the significance.
It's one thing if Trump posts and then Q posts -- it just means Q is using a snooper program to see when Trump posts and then plops his turds out as soon as he can.
But that's not what's happened.
Pay attention to the order:
Q posts on the Chans.
Trump Tweets soon after.
Then Q posts on the Chans, again.
Then Trump Tweets soon after, once again.
Over and over, until we see that they are actually narrowing the time difference (delta) between the postings.
Up until Q posts and then, LESS THAN A MINUTE LATER, Trump Tweets.
That happened 36 freaking times before December 2019!
The only explanation is that Trump is watching the Chans for when Q posts so he knows when to post. That, or Trump is openly telling Q he's about to post and then waits until Q goes first...
And take a note at the convergence trends. There are very few 1-minute deltas. That, coupled with the clear line of best fit with positive correlation, shows an intention to converge timestamps towards a 0-point delta (less than 1 minute apart).
How many times does this "coincidence" have to occur until it's clear Trump is telling Q when he is about to post?
Well, the graph above shows that the likelihood that it was all just mere chance would be far beyond statistically probable. You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning while winning the lottery and then mauled by a polar bear.
It's that unlikely that Q was just guessing real gud-ly.
When people tell you "Q is a psyop" the FIRST thing you should point out is that Trump is statistically, provably involved with the psyop. They are joined at the hip, like Siamese twins.
If Q is a CIA plot, then so is Trump.
Only Autists can appreciate just how difficult the whole scheme would have to be to even accomplish what is plainly obvious given the timestamps. Plainly put, if you can't read the data and come to the same conclusion -- you wouldn't make the cut on The Apprentice.
This is the most powerful proof we have -- and I'm sorta sad I don't see it discussed as common knowledge at this point... This is the magic bullet against any naysayers. At this point, with as much verifiable info we have; if someone doesn't understand the raw data, it's because they simply don't want to.
Study the data in post 3727. Understand just how significant this proof system is over all the nonsense "predictions" they claim Q keeps getting wrong. Q never made predictions -- just check the posts yourself.
Instead, Q posts obscure hints that only make sense once the related event transpires. There is no prediction, there is only a validation effort. Once the event happens, Q is standing there on the previous post and everyone is scratching their heads wondering how those key-terms managed to pop up so succinctly.
That's why we're here... Because Q is legit beyond a shadow of a doubt. Only those ostriches with their heads in the sand are still not willing to admit that.
Do they really believe that no ship was sunk that night? That no people actually died?
I've seen a load of newspaper front pages from back then that said the Titanic hit an iceberg, but the passengers had been saved and the Titanic was being towed back to land. I think there was a YouTube video on that. So yes, there are some people who think it didn't sink. Also there seems to be evidence that the Titanic and Britannic were swapped out.
My grandfather knew a man who survived by dressing as a woman and getting on a life raft. I don't think anyone liked him.