However, like it or not, that is was the media calls us. That is what normies know us by. The Kash interview is a bit of a big deal. Think drip, drip, drip. The normies don't give two rats craps the separation of Q and Anons and "QAnon."
If we want to introduce ourselves (perhaps more accurately, if they are going to start to listen to us), we're going to have to do it in their language, initially.
Speculation can abound from that point forward in this discussion, but for now lets take this win for what it is. A broader introduction to the masses that we aren't crazy conspiracy nuts.
We are the news and [they] have dubbed us QAnon. I say whatever gets the message out (actually Kash said that too didn't he?) we roll with it.
Soldier on frens.
We may have to take it over and bend it to mean what we want
We're good at that
I use the word "anon" and tell people that I talk to other anonymous people to try to understand international politics and medical issues. Then I wait for them to make the connection which they don't usually.
That's OK, because the principle remains that there are a group of people with a diverse skillset spending their own time and effort analysing things in all aspects.
I tell them that ideas are properly tested by uncensored argument in places like this.