You're welcome, fren. Tineye can really come in handy. Not only can you verify photos, but you can determine how old they are and where they were first published.
So, why didn't you help the pede out? Show him how to avoid this mistake in the future? We're all at different stages of learning here -- and we all make mistakes.
thanks lap
Confirmed -- it has been shopped.
http://images2.corriereobjects.it/methode_image/2016/02/03/Politica/Foto%20Gallery/MELONIOLD2.JPG
Here's a tip for you, fren. You can run photos through tineye.com to help determine whether they've been shopped or not.
tineye.com will show you where a photo has been used in the past. Here are the results for your photo:
https://tineye.com/search/f3e2a842ae6fbd2a73a8a54669bc3202c3e58f31?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1
thanks lonewulf
You're welcome, fren. Tineye can really come in handy. Not only can you verify photos, but you can determine how old they are and where they were first published.
added to tool bar. i love getting new tools
fuck off
do better
delete your post
You can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.
This is a major blunder. Even to the casual eye you could see something was wrong. Thus I have little tolerance.
So, why didn't you help the pede out? Show him how to avoid this mistake in the future? We're all at different stages of learning here -- and we all make mistakes.