The Nord Stream II was full of liquified natural gas stored at 1,570 psi pressure. The liquified gas would turn to vapor immediately at -160 deg.F on discharging from the pipe breach into 250 feet depth water at 105 psi pressure and roughly 50 deg.F temperature.

The gas would expand almost immediately to 424 times its original liquid volume and would rush to the surface in a column of expanding roiling bubbles. I did calculations and the diameter of the bubble (gas release) area at the water surface should only be 800 feet, and that is for a full 48 inch diameter pipe breach at that depth. m

It doesn't make sense that the news kept reporting a bubble diameter of 1 kilometer or more. No way. Also, the rising gas vapor would warm as it is in contact with water, but due to the volume and velocity, it would still warm from -160 deg.F at pipe breach to only about -40 deg.F at the surface. There would be an incredible dense fog at the surface as ultra cold gas vapor meets warmer humid air. Zero fog in any of the photos, no sign of ice crystals forming at water surface.m

Also, when the liquid gas expands to 424 times volume at pipeline breach on sea floor, then rises that quickly in the water column, it would create a huge upwelling and vacuum suction behind itself. There would be a very strong current of water at sea floor flowing towards that vacuum where the gas is expanding from the pipe breach. That would carry silt and debris into the rising column and we should be seeing silt trails flowing away from the bubble area at the surface. m

None of those things are happening. Also, you would think by now that air monitoring would have shown satellite images of the natural gas plume in the atmosphere. They can monitor CO2, and other emission sources and show the colorized atmospheric concentrations of pollutants... but somehow nobody is monitoring the atmosphere over the largest natural gas leak on the planet?l

None of what the we are seeing makes physical sense. I'm wondering if the pipeline breach isn't faked. No underwater photos? This could be an arranged false flag. All we have really seen so far are bubbles at water surface as "evidence"... but there should be a much more volatile, roiling surface over a smaller diameter and surrounded by a dense fog maybe 30 feet thick above the water surface. Any thoughts?