Ugh. ‘Gave ammunition to the msn’ is not an objective way to describe reality. He didn’t ‘give’ anything. There was no giving. So don’t say that he gave anything. What you’re trying to say is that the msn will use the annexation against us in some way. They’ll spin it and convince normies that Putin bad, freedom bad, whatever. News flash: they do that with absolutely everything. And this will be no different. Annexation of these territories was a must, regardless of the obvious fact that man would always spin it against us. It does not ‘set us back’. We are in an infowar, we don’t sit around and complain that by winning we are ‘giving the enemy ammunition’. You might want to check the huuuge amount of downvoted your non objective and pussy ass perspective has garnered.
Ugh. ‘Gave ammunition to the msn’ is not an objective way to describe reality. He didn’t ‘give’ anything. There was no giving. So don’t say that he gave anything. What you’re trying to say is that the msn will use the annexation against us in some way. They’ll spin it and convince normies that Putin bad, freedom bad, whatever. News flash: they do that with absolutely everything. And this will be no different. Annexation of these territories was a must, regardless of the obvious fact that man would always spin it against us. It does not ‘set us back’. We are in an infowar, we don’t sit around and complain that by winning we are ‘giving the enemy ammunition’. You might want to check the huuuge amount of downvoted your non objective and pussy ass perspective has garnered.
Yes, he did. He had soldiers there, he controlled the territory, he didn’t have to move to formally add it to Russia.
By doing it - he “gave”. He could avoid it and it wouldn’t change anything else other that just “ammunition”. So yes, he gave.
Timing is everything. If he really wanted to do it he could wait until we win.
More slings and arrows. By calling names you’re not winning the logic.
So what exactly we won by the annexation?