Cal just banned toddler autopsies 😳
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
I am going to post the highlighted text because the tweet is misleading. If you read what the highlighted text says compared to what the tweet claims I think you'll see what I mean. Highlighted text:
"This bill would delete the requirement that a coroner hold inquests for deaths related to or following known or suspected self-induced or criminal abortion, and would delete the requirement that an unattended fetal death be handled as a death without medical attendance. The bill would prohibit using the coroner’s statements on the certificate of fetal death to establish, bring, or support a criminal prosecution or civil cause of damages against a person who is immune from liability based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, or who aids a pregnant person in exercising their rights under the Reproductive Privacy Act, as specified."
I am curious, what part of this bans somebody from investigating the death of a baby? As far as I can tell the quoted section gets rid of a requirement that coroner's "hold inquests for deaths related to or following known or suspected self-induced or criminal abortion", changes the way an "unattended fetal death" is handled, and prohibits using a coroner's findings to bring a complaint against the party that provided you the abortion. None of that suggests you can no longer investigate the cause of your babies death does it?
I feel like it's bare minimum effort to make sure something quoted or highlighted says what you claim it does.
Thanks for that. After squinting at the screencapped text I was going to find the original. Yes it is funny that "fetus" became "child" became "toddler". Now the podcast that mentions this post will talk about how autopsies for teenagers are banned lol
The text, without the title, is appalling.
Yes ban is not what it is, but the ramifications surely can be imagined to be horrific.
See the top rated post.
I can explain where the hyperbolic title came from. A different form of this bill was created after two women were criminally prosecuted because their babies were born drug addicted and died of withdraw shortly thereafter. The politicians behind it -- and the state attorney general -- said it was horrible that women were being persecuted for the death of the babies.
That original bill was HORRIFYING. It did ban all autopsies and investigations on babies under 30 days old (maybe it was 20 days, I don't remember all the details now). It was basically a giveaway to the satanists to mutilate newborns with no fear of any consequences. That language seems to have been removed from this bill; investigations and autopsies can be launched, but now that they are not mandatory, it will be a lot easier for the satanists to be more open with their activities now that they can evade an autopsy/investigation. Here is an article about the original bill: https://californiaglobe.com/articles/infanticide-or-pregnancy-loss-abortion-bill-passes-assembly-judiciary-committee/