Agreed. However, the OP used the term, 'the most secure election ever,' which is a direct reference to 2020. Like many posters, s/he might not have read the actual article.
Of course there isn't and I didn't say there was. Only that it is said (by media, dems, etc.) and I think you know that and I think you know exactly what I meant so I'm done here.
A distinction without a difference.
There was nothing done in between 2020 election, and previous elections, to make us believe the elections were any more secure.
Agreed. However, the OP used the term, 'the most secure election ever,' which is a direct reference to 2020. Like many posters, s/he might not have read the actual article.
Theres no credible evidence that the 2020 election was the most secure election ever
Of course there isn't and I didn't say there was. Only that it is said (by media, dems, etc.) and I think you know that and I think you know exactly what I meant so I'm done here.