π€π±π¦ Elon Musk agrees to buy Twitter at original price π€π±π¦
(citizenfreepress.com)
π THIS IS A TROLL: π
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (79)
sorted by:
Synonyms. But if you want to play a game of sophistry and semantics, knock yourself out. Have a ball.
Never said any such thing. I said that Trump make a campaign promise that if he were President, then Hillary would be locked up. He was President. She's not locked up. That's just a statement of fact. What you make of that is up to you.
There's no flawed conclusion. There's Hillary, not in prison. Trump didn't put her there, a promise he campaigned on. Trump is the greatest politician of all time, in spite of his shtick of not being a politician.
Many think that Trump is Q+. But how do you know he is?
π been here just as long if not longer than you fren.
When did I say that? Maybe you should review people's posting history before jumping to false conclusions and looking like an ass in the process...
I assess Trump for what he is, or at least makes himself out to be.
But do you know that you're an ad?
Coming from an ad, I'll take that as a compliment.
Two great minds... or something π€·π»π
I'd say I pity the ads, but sometimes you can't even tell if they're real or not, and can't feel emotion towards AI. In any case, would be nice to fast forward through the ads like you can with recorded shows.
Oh yes, there's the different between bots and ads. Bots are AI. Ads are humans, paid for their work. Some AI might well be preferable to interact with than LOI... lack of intelligence
https://youtu.be/rJck0ZfmAXc
And numerous other similar rally statements (where campaign promises are made), topped off with....
https://youtu.be/K1Q71k6fmts
The fact that "Lock Her Up" became the iconic soundtrack of the campaign should tell you all you need to know... and then add the Q claim that she would be arrested (at some point, sometime, maybe within the next 30 years before she dies), and you've got yourself a massive instance of eventfagging that has yet to be realized and at this point, doesn't seen likely to happen. We still wait, and hope, but this has reached the level of being stood up by the same girl for 3 straight dates... normally by that point, you don't waste your time anymore.
Never argued against Trump being Q+. I stated that you don't know, and none of us know, that Trump is Q+. We may think he is, we may believe he is, but it's still speculative conjecture. Your failure to grasp this reality, only further confirms your existence of being an ad.
This should be fun
Never said POTUS has the unilateral power to throw anyone in jail. Granted, during time of war (which we've been in a state of war since Sept 14, 2001) POTUS has quite broad war powers and can actually order the arrest of virtually anyone so long as there is probable cause on suspicion of terrorism. Even during time of peace, POTUS is responsible for directing the DOJ to prosecute. Did Trump order investigations? Sure. And yet here we still are. You understand that you keep missing the point, right? Trump got at least half the country to seriously believe that he'd put Hillary in jail. That's what a politician does. Again, Miracles for Sale. Brilliant performance by an actor playing the role of politician (who ironically and fittingly sold the shtick of not being a politician)
See above regarding actual constitutional powers. Also, never said "jailed without due process." Have to hand it to you, the sophistry is top level.
"If I was President, you'd be in jail." The implication is as clear as can be, with an if-then conditional statement. His audience heard and interpreted exactly what he (and others) wanted. The response (Lock Her Up) demonstrated that brilliance. Far more effective than political campaign battle cries like Yes We Can, Hope and Change, Tippecanoe and Tyler Too, and Fifty-Four Forty or Fight... this was "waving the bloody shirt" on steroids. Again. Political brilliance, especially comebined with MAGA and Save America.
Never said that.
Bearing false witness ain't cool my dude
Never said "Q isn't provable". And what do you even mean by that? Q as in, a person or group? A plan, a la the Q Plan? Prophecies or predictions? What is "Q" to be proved? What happened to words mean things?
So "it" (whatever "it" is, that you've failed to define) is or isn't? You attack a alleged claim never made, that it isn't, as being invalid, and follow it up with an assertion that it isn't actual provable but copout with "that's by design." Brilliant.
You seem to care. Quite a lot, in fact...
Well, more specifically it's the Great Awakening board, of which Q posts are discussed with the assumption of legitimacy.
I'm acting surprised by thoughts that I myself, on countless occasions, have discussed in the affirmative?
You seem quite concerned, given your extensive engagement of my comments.
Bringing us back to the most important question here: do you know you're an ad? π€