Am I missing something here? I've followed his work for a while and haven't seen anything that has left a bad taste in my mouth. I don't think being skeptical of Q is an issue. Last I checked, most of the people on here are skeptical by nature.
A few years ago he claimed to 'debunk' Q by posting online messages as proof which turned out to be fake. Something about Microchip, I don't remember the details.
It was Microchip who gave him screen grabs...whom after Jacks "Expose" came out and admitted he faked all of it. I still think Jack was in on it all along but was just playing the game. He is Ex Military Intelligence after all.
Am I missing something here? I've followed his work for a while and haven't seen anything that has left a bad taste in my mouth. I don't think being skeptical of Q is an issue. Last I checked, most of the people on here are skeptical by nature.
Not trying to be a dick, thanks for the post.
A few years ago he claimed to 'debunk' Q by posting online messages as proof which turned out to be fake. Something about Microchip, I don't remember the details.
It was Microchip who gave him screen grabs...whom after Jacks "Expose" came out and admitted he faked all of it. I still think Jack was in on it all along but was just playing the game. He is Ex Military Intelligence after all.
Also don't forget he got his start as an InfoWars guy
https://greatawakening.win/p/12igmLfX4p/top-10-reasons-why-you-should-st/
I'd like to see some of that. I'll try to dig for a bit. Thanks
https://greatawakening.win/p/12igmLfX4p/top-10-reasons-why-you-should-st/
He's one of the main pushers of the Q being either some random 4chan mod or one of the Watkins
Hey, if you’ve gone over Q proofs and you are skeptical… you are actually what’s called a moron.
Down voted like only a Glowie gag got could.