As with real estate, location/jurisdiction matters. It's less about the blueness/redness of the state and more about the DA that would have jurisdiction. I'm in a blood red state and we have Soros backed attorneys running all the time and plenty of the Republicans are corrupt too.
Put more simply, if the Michigan DA was Soros-owned, then why would Gascon need to get involved?
Mastriano is running for PA governor. You're thinking of DaPerno probably.
As with real estate, location/jurisdiction matters. It's less about the blueness/redness of the state and more about the DA that would have jurisdiction. I'm in a blood red state and we have Soros backed attorneys running all the time and plenty of the Republicans are corrupt too.
Put more simply, if the Michigan DA was Soros-owned, then why would Gascon need to get involved?
Mastriano is running for PA governor. You're thinking of DaPerno probably.
Also, it might be important which federal appeals circuit would be involved
Yeah I keep mixing up those two.