https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZZSkwC4xqs
He just got kicked out of the court room a second time.
He's defending himself without access to counsel.
Everyone, judge included, are doing a horrible job trying to control him.
This is ridiculous and I honestly have no idea what's gonna happen.
Here's the Rekieta Law link if you want commentary. Warning, they're not kind to Sovereign Citizen doctrine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDaBGRdBEJk
The pro-se/pro-per argument was also highly interesting. Apparently lawyers are extremely sensitive about these terms in a way that I can only compare to how doctors behave about vaccines or flouride.
They can't just answer directly what the difference is and why one term might be preferred over the other. If you do a simple search for these terms their answer will boil down to "so and so [group_pejorative] think there is a difference but they are the same thing".
Huh? Since when are lawyers--notorious for knife fighting over definitions of trivial words--so blase about this sort of question? It appears they have been programmed to emotionally react rather than engage on this issue...