I saw it multiple times, I believe you guys too. The term “shapeshifters” or “reptilians” or “flat earth” that we saw in various posts here and on other sites.
I will show you how it’s used by the bad guys to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label and slow down awakening.
Example:
”Billy Corgan: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”
https://newspunch.com/billy-corgan-shapeshifting-reptilians/
My reaction to it is:
Add “flat earth” to it and you can easily label all inconvenient truth as “conspiracy theory”.
As simple as that.
They could have done it better this way: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ who live on the opposite side of the Flat Earth Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”.
Recall Pelosi saying on video:
We smear somebody with falsehood and all the rest, then you (journalists) print it and we say: The Press has published that (…) - it legitimises what we said, .. etc.
Talking about “shapeshifters” and “reptilians” is a similar tactic but it’s used to strengthen “conspiracy theorist” label.
When do they need to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label?
-
when the label stops working,
-
when people discover that all previous conspiracy theories came out to be a reality,
-
when we’re winning awakening the masses.
The deep state has to stick some bullshit they can call later so that people won’t believe it, otherwise the “conspiracy theorist” label will stop working at all.
Think about it as a slider that reflects the % of the truth within the “conspiracy theory” space.
-
We prove something was real, we move the slider closer to 100%
-
We say that the difference between the conspiracy theory and the reality was 2 years, 6 months and now it’s 2 months.
-
We’re destroying the term (a weapon) the C_A has created to prevent awakening.
-
They want to move the slider back where it was, closer to 0% so the term (a weapon) can be used again.
It’s NOT about the flat earth or reptilians.
It’s about Awakening.
Everyone who pushes these theories is either unaware or is a shill working for the deep state for money. People who try to justify “we use it to label (them)” are also either unaware or are paid shills who word Kadr to prevent awakening.
When we hear someone like this article and person “witnessing” it (especially famous person) - we have to note it as he isn’t on our side and will betray us. These celebrities are bought to make a contrast between:
- their lies and fake reality they want us to live and believe in,
versus:
- the truth about their pedo perversions, rapes, blackmail and satanic sacrifice.
Once they add something crazy and unreal to the second group - people are more likely to sit in the first box. Be aware of that!
Even if you’re crazy enough to believe that reptilians are real - it’s your choice. But if you really support the Great Awakening - you need to be aware that normies won’t move from the box 1 to box 2 if you add too much for them to accept. Knowing that: avoid flat earth and reptilians terminology here, leave it for yourself for later, if you enjoy it and focus on Great Awakening.
It’s a social engineering, consciously used by the Deep State.
At this stage anyone pushing flat earth and reptilians theories slows down the awakening process, no matter if consciously and intentionally or not.
I’ve made this post quite long and intentionally used the keywords in the title. Some shills will jump in and start calling me names without even reading the whole post. Once you’ve read the whole thing up until here - you understand who can sponsor to push these theories. Let them to reveal themselves, check their posts and their other comments, give your vote to the article and comments. Digital battlefield.
More in the sense of treating the earth as a perfect sphere when that's not accurate.
The Antarctica question doesn't impact a flat earth or not.
I'm reasonably certain that the moon is not a ball of plasma resulting from a reflection of energy interacting with the firmament.
The dumbs question has no bearing.
A hollow earth is more plausible than a flat earth, which would make planetary bodies as more like a toroidal shape rather than a sphere.
Your last point is where I agree, there are legitimate questions and I have little doubt that the DS has ensured that we are living in as much of a fiction as they can maintain.
Antarctica is crucial in FE. I know we aren’t supposed to talk about this though so I will stop. It’s just frustrating that people are allowed to slander and strawman and the actual arguments aren’t allowed. Seems like a cheap shot to me, and so similar to the globalist cabal slander, strawmanning, and censorship. At least you guys are still against pedophiles, but never forget how many of you were strawmanning and slandering the “anti-vaxxers” three years ago and the “climate deniers” five years ago.
So many of you also used to go raging hate on us when we brought up the Lolita Express and Epstein. That was dismissed as “batshit crazy paranoia”. So plenty of people here used to run defense for pedophiles and didn’t realize it. Don’t forget that and be aware of who you might be running defense for now. Like all the “truthers” who won’t go near Sandy Hook. You are running cover for evil when you do that, don’t you think?
The topic was stickied for a time, can only assume that mods intend on looking the other way as that goes. (Ive not done any reports or raised avoiding the topic in thread, even though I agree because of how that will appear to newly redpilled)
Anyway, my understanding was that FE reorients the map such that the south pole is the barrier. If there's more, please elaborate. Otherwise, there's wayy too much fuckery surrounding Antarctica, who knows what to believe.
Yeah in the model Antarctica forms the outer rim of the basin that contains all the world’s oceans. Not saying anyone has to believe this, just that in an accurate description of the model, Antarctica is crucial. Hope I didn’t come off as rude. I know this is a subject that people get heated over, which is why I think mods try to keep it off GA.
Yes, definitely a topic that people get heated over. I never understood how people could be falling for a trick that had been resolved centuries ago, especially when there are scientific principles that cover most every piece of evidence.
Now, if you follow the other comment thread, the other person posted some links for consideration. Unlike most debates I've engaged on this, one of the links was a series of 20 proofs of a flat earth... I had explanations for the first few, but then issues raised that conflicted the explanation I would have given prior. It was somewhere around the emergency flight landings and the large scale bridge projects being built without any adjustments for any curvature that melted my brain.
I ended because a "related" link was a debate of flat vs globe earth, and that's what really hammered in just how much is just ingrained from a young age and not based on anything empirical or testable. The flat earth people made a strong case for electric universe at the same time while the globe earth were constantly appealing to nasa and satelite data that can't be replicated.