I saw it multiple times, I believe you guys too. The term “shapeshifters” or “reptilians” or “flat earth” that we saw in various posts here and on other sites.
I will show you how it’s used by the bad guys to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label and slow down awakening.
Example:
”Billy Corgan: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”
https://newspunch.com/billy-corgan-shapeshifting-reptilians/
My reaction to it is:
Add “flat earth” to it and you can easily label all inconvenient truth as “conspiracy theory”.
As simple as that.
They could have done it better this way: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ who live on the opposite side of the Flat Earth Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”.
Recall Pelosi saying on video:
We smear somebody with falsehood and all the rest, then you (journalists) print it and we say: The Press has published that (…) - it legitimises what we said, .. etc.
Talking about “shapeshifters” and “reptilians” is a similar tactic but it’s used to strengthen “conspiracy theorist” label.
When do they need to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label?
-
when the label stops working,
-
when people discover that all previous conspiracy theories came out to be a reality,
-
when we’re winning awakening the masses.
The deep state has to stick some bullshit they can call later so that people won’t believe it, otherwise the “conspiracy theorist” label will stop working at all.
Think about it as a slider that reflects the % of the truth within the “conspiracy theory” space.
-
We prove something was real, we move the slider closer to 100%
-
We say that the difference between the conspiracy theory and the reality was 2 years, 6 months and now it’s 2 months.
-
We’re destroying the term (a weapon) the C_A has created to prevent awakening.
-
They want to move the slider back where it was, closer to 0% so the term (a weapon) can be used again.
It’s NOT about the flat earth or reptilians.
It’s about Awakening.
Everyone who pushes these theories is either unaware or is a shill working for the deep state for money. People who try to justify “we use it to label (them)” are also either unaware or are paid shills who word Kadr to prevent awakening.
When we hear someone like this article and person “witnessing” it (especially famous person) - we have to note it as he isn’t on our side and will betray us. These celebrities are bought to make a contrast between:
- their lies and fake reality they want us to live and believe in,
versus:
- the truth about their pedo perversions, rapes, blackmail and satanic sacrifice.
Once they add something crazy and unreal to the second group - people are more likely to sit in the first box. Be aware of that!
Even if you’re crazy enough to believe that reptilians are real - it’s your choice. But if you really support the Great Awakening - you need to be aware that normies won’t move from the box 1 to box 2 if you add too much for them to accept. Knowing that: avoid flat earth and reptilians terminology here, leave it for yourself for later, if you enjoy it and focus on Great Awakening.
It’s a social engineering, consciously used by the Deep State.
At this stage anyone pushing flat earth and reptilians theories slows down the awakening process, no matter if consciously and intentionally or not.
I’ve made this post quite long and intentionally used the keywords in the title. Some shills will jump in and start calling me names without even reading the whole post. Once you’ve read the whole thing up until here - you understand who can sponsor to push these theories. Let them to reveal themselves, check their posts and their other comments, give your vote to the article and comments. Digital battlefield.
The round earth model is self-consistent. Every question you ask about it, every confusion you have with it, every observation you make with your own eyes, can be answered within the framework of this theory. (And I can do just that, if you want. You may not be satisfied with the answers though.)
The same cannot be said about flat earth.
For example, here you introduce the idea that light does not travel in an approximately straight line from its source. “atmospheric lensing”, you say. In other words, “you can’t trust your own eyes.” Am I hearing this correctly? Anyways… Why does “atmospheric lensing” not apply to objects we send high into the air, but it happens to only affect light from celestial objects in such a way that it perfectly imitates the round earth model?
Give me some equations for your theory. Let’s make some measurable predictions. Unless you’re too scared that the truth will upset your worldview?
Read your own sentence back to yourself. You are are operating in the realm of mental abstractions (models, theory and frameworks). None are based in reality, they are all purely thought. It is a fascinating exercise to see how easily humans can delude themselves by thought alone however...but that's a discussion for another time.
I said nothing of the sort. You invented that idea in your mind. See how this works? Mental capture. You aren't seeing clearly, you are lost in THINKING.
On another note, I happen to believe that light does not "TRAVEL" at all. Yet another lie brought to you by the heliocentric deceivers. But that's too much to get into here. Go find yourself the scientific experiment that proves "the speed of light" and get back to me on what you find (even the V-Sauce video contains ASSUMPTIONS BTW). I'll wait.
No, you're not. You are INTERPRETING my words in a convoluted way that is highly bizarre. The atmosPLANE contains water - sometimes enormous amounts (high humidity) - amongst other things. There are dozens of examples of how looking at something through water is distorted. Pick any.
This sentence makes even last sense than the previous two. No idea what you're thinking here.
Here's one of yours. And the beauty is, you don't have to take my word for it, nor anybody else's. Your globe curvature is supposed to fall away at 8 inches per mile squared. Your 3950 mile radius DEMANDS this must be true. And yet, we can see things through telephoto lenses that should be hidden by the alleged curvature. This is precisely something we can "MEASURE and make predictions with". And the heliocentric model is IRREFUTABLY PROVEN false with just this...tests you can do yourself.
Your equation is IRREFUTABLY INCORRECT. And you can go out and prove it to yourself instead of staying lost in mental abstractions.
Here's a video demonstrating a dozen or so examples for your viewing pleasure: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQoz9aiNRzU&t=608s
Where does that leave us? NASA are the honest heroes none of us deserve and all flat earther's are a bunch of lying, deceiving morons with incredible photoshop and video production skills? Or vice versa?
It's one or the other. We can agree on one thing. Somebody is lying.... BIGLY. I've bet the farm that the gang who runs the Fed, ConVid-1984, vaccines, FDA, CIA, CDC, FBI, CNN, Fox, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, etc.....and...oh yeah... NASA.... are all on the same team.... are our PROVEN {Time and time again} LIARS. As they say, birds of a feather.
If you're on this board, surely you agree with me on most of those on the list as being anything but honest brokers, but you've got to make an exception for NASA and the universities. As I see it, that puts you in an awkward, if not untenable position that's hard to defend from my POV.
Whether or not light “travels” is irrelevant. Certainly you believe in such a thing as “line of sight” between our eyes and the things we see, right? So there must be a line… a “path”… between the two.
Hitler drank water.
I am taking your words to their logical conclusion. Because apparently nothing in the sky is where it looks like it is, in terms of angle.
It’s too late in the night for me to properly address this
What can I say? I like thinking.
Off the top of my head, there was one where a guy pointed a laser at a mirror through the teeth of a spinning gear. What’s the issue with that?
I’m going to bed. I’ll be sure to tuck in your straw men too.
Of course.
I don't follow...
I've suggested the possibility that we may not be looking at "things". I can't prove it, but nobody can disprove it either. Lights have a way of reflecting and refracting unlike actual "things" (Matter). We will keep talking past one another if you imagine 93million miles away balls of gas while I'm suggesting 3300miles away lights. If I can contemplate things from your perspective, you too must be able to do the same from mine. What I'm trying to say is that we can throw LOGIC out the door if you hold fast to the heliocentric model assumptions.
That's the simple calculation that works perfectly for up to 500-1000 miles. We only need it to demonstrate things in the 5-100 mile range that SHATTER the globe lie.
Hahahaha! Agreed. You win the day with this clever comment. Touche!