I saw it multiple times, I believe you guys too. The term “shapeshifters” or “reptilians” or “flat earth” that we saw in various posts here and on other sites.
I will show you how it’s used by the bad guys to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label and slow down awakening.
Example:
”Billy Corgan: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”
https://newspunch.com/billy-corgan-shapeshifting-reptilians/
My reaction to it is:
Add “flat earth” to it and you can easily label all inconvenient truth as “conspiracy theory”.
As simple as that.
They could have done it better this way: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ who live on the opposite side of the Flat Earth Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”.
Recall Pelosi saying on video:
We smear somebody with falsehood and all the rest, then you (journalists) print it and we say: The Press has published that (…) - it legitimises what we said, .. etc.
Talking about “shapeshifters” and “reptilians” is a similar tactic but it’s used to strengthen “conspiracy theorist” label.
When do they need to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label?
-
when the label stops working,
-
when people discover that all previous conspiracy theories came out to be a reality,
-
when we’re winning awakening the masses.
The deep state has to stick some bullshit they can call later so that people won’t believe it, otherwise the “conspiracy theorist” label will stop working at all.
Think about it as a slider that reflects the % of the truth within the “conspiracy theory” space.
-
We prove something was real, we move the slider closer to 100%
-
We say that the difference between the conspiracy theory and the reality was 2 years, 6 months and now it’s 2 months.
-
We’re destroying the term (a weapon) the C_A has created to prevent awakening.
-
They want to move the slider back where it was, closer to 0% so the term (a weapon) can be used again.
It’s NOT about the flat earth or reptilians.
It’s about Awakening.
Everyone who pushes these theories is either unaware or is a shill working for the deep state for money. People who try to justify “we use it to label (them)” are also either unaware or are paid shills who word Kadr to prevent awakening.
When we hear someone like this article and person “witnessing” it (especially famous person) - we have to note it as he isn’t on our side and will betray us. These celebrities are bought to make a contrast between:
- their lies and fake reality they want us to live and believe in,
versus:
- the truth about their pedo perversions, rapes, blackmail and satanic sacrifice.
Once they add something crazy and unreal to the second group - people are more likely to sit in the first box. Be aware of that!
Even if you’re crazy enough to believe that reptilians are real - it’s your choice. But if you really support the Great Awakening - you need to be aware that normies won’t move from the box 1 to box 2 if you add too much for them to accept. Knowing that: avoid flat earth and reptilians terminology here, leave it for yourself for later, if you enjoy it and focus on Great Awakening.
It’s a social engineering, consciously used by the Deep State.
At this stage anyone pushing flat earth and reptilians theories slows down the awakening process, no matter if consciously and intentionally or not.
I’ve made this post quite long and intentionally used the keywords in the title. Some shills will jump in and start calling me names without even reading the whole post. Once you’ve read the whole thing up until here - you understand who can sponsor to push these theories. Let them to reveal themselves, check their posts and their other comments, give your vote to the article and comments. Digital battlefield.
Well, no, that's not a just a perspective effect, in the Northern hemisphere you would see the stars rotating around Polaris, and there's a similar effect around the southern pole, there's not a specific star in that side. If the stars are rotating around a flat plane with height, there's only room for a singular pivot point.
You could also argue that particulates in the atmosphere, things that fog up the view.
Anyway, the next group of points raised I actually listed why that is plausible and consistent, in that laser light is straight in the context of a room, but when scaling up, that light will have a curve in the fluid, as in, if the laser and target were aligned, the extent of that influence could be noted as changes in pressure and humidity impact the density of the fluid.
Similar, with bodies of water, because the water can't be compressed, it can be displaced by pressure creating 'flatter' zones at the surface, in a lower pressure circumstance it won't work the same way.
To the quandary; I don't believe, nor do I need to believe, that they are liars, hell, on the drive when I moved to my new city, it was around 60 miles where the tallest buildings were notable (it was night driving which made better contrast).
That also comes down to thinking in terms of a perfect sphere, which is not the case, I mean, just that there are mountains and valleys should be sufficient to make that argument, so, using these calculators works if you know that the surface being measured aligns with the sphere or if there's divergences.
Unfortunately, the limits of that experimentation mentioned is that it only really serves to demonstrate that the specific segment is 'flatter than expected'
The concessions I'm willing to make on this area are as follows:
NASA and all DS are trying to keep everyone as ignorant as possible, while needing to keep them knowledgeable enough to be useful (or recruited).
Most scientific disciplines have been corrupted and obfuscate things so that conclusions can be guided in desired directions
There are no truly accurate maps in use (only accurate enough to be 'useable')
Well I agree with all your bullet points, but frankly you lost me in the above paragraphs. I've been responding to quite a few people tonight.
Did I share a video with laser measurements with you? I can't recall. If I did, you're saying all these different people just happened to pick areas that are "flatter then normal"? Am I understanding your position correctly?
That and how in that great of distance you start having to take atmospheric considerations that will impact on the 'straightness' of the laser beam because of how light bends in a fluid.
How do you figure the sun and moon fit in to this model? For physics to not break, a flat earth requires a much closer sun and moon (for example).
Why are all other stellar objects spherical?
It doesn't matter. If the laser is pointed down, it won't make it even a few hundred feet. And likewise, if pointed upward even a tiny bit, over 20 miles it could not be seen. It has to be level for the experiment to have any validity. They go to great lengths to ensure it is. Regardless, if the earth is curved, you can calculate the IMPOSSIBLITY of seeing the laser regardless of how perfectly flat it is.... due to earth curvature.
Correct, a very astute observation. Most legit flat-earth researchers believe somewhere between 3000-4000 miles distance for both the sun and the moon. We don't know for sure. We don't believe anybody knows "for sure". However, here's a mysterious free mason saying he does, placing both at 3300 miles away.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SMjVkJaq8w
Is it right? True? I certainly can't validate any of it. But it sure is intriguing. And interestingly matches up nicely with some very ancient texts.
Also, there's considerable evidence that sea-faring navigators with sextants of yore believed the sun and moon to both be 3500 miles away. Records of this have been heavily suppressed however. But we know for sure that a sextant can't work without making a 90-degree triangle at the base (aka a "flat plane"). Zero chance you could navigate the seas with a sextant on a curved surface over long distances.
If I had a nickel for every time I'm asked this question! But it's undoubtedly the most common one, and it was my question that my FE-buddy couldn't answer for me about 8 years ago. I asked "why are all the other planets round but not earth"? He couldn't answer it to my satisfaction. So I totally get where you're coming from. And here's your answer...
First, you have to place all NASA IMAGES (not photographs), but photoshopped, artistic renderings in the trash and start anew with fresh, innocent eyes. What do you see? Are these really "spheres" you see? Or are they "CIRCLES"? Don't most light sources appear as circles?
And even the moon is the same, despite legit high-res photographs. Ask yourself why you can't see any other features, angles, sides of the moon except ONE...EVER...under any and all circumstances? There's no time, place, situation, or circumstance ever where we can see an extra 5, 10, 15 degrees of the "moon face"? Does that make sense?
Does it make sense that the moon is just perfectly and magically locked, by pure random chance, with the alleged earth spin such that we only ever get to see one side? And does it make sense that the moon just so happens to perfectly be 400 times smaller than the sun, and that the sun just so happens to be perfectly 400 times farther away from the moon such that they appear to be the EXACT SAME SIZE and therefore capable of a perfect eclipse?
Or, does it make more sense you're looking at two lights/plasmas/projections/reflections (we don't know for sure) that are the exact same size and the exact same distance from earth....which...just coincidentally...is exactly what your own God-given common sense perception tells you?
I personally believe we live inside an enclosed dome of some sort, made out of what I haven't the foggiest idea. I can't prove it of course. This is my belief. I also believe a rainbow is a prismatic REFLECTION off of said dome. And both the sun and moon are some sort of reflections/projections shining into the dome but aren't really "there" like we think of a "thing" being "there" in an X-Y coordinate "position x". Such that they aren't really "things" (matter) as we have been taught to conceive of them (such thinking which heavily distorts how we then modify our perceptions and can then extrapolate into elaborate models and frameworks accordingly).
Further, here's an interesting new video showing how the lighting bolt and subsequent thunder clap seems to be bouncing off of something and reverberating as simulated inside of certain dome-like echo chambers. The similarity is noteworthy. Can I prove any of it? Of course not. These are what I believe to be the best explanations to date, that is all.
Check it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0t5YS_i9Lo
Fun food for thought anyway. Very interesting...
I appreciate you asking rational, reasonable questions rather than just telling me I'm an idiot. It's the sign of an open and curious mind, which I immensely respect. And just so you know, I was once a flat-earth despiser too. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF US WAS. I set out to shut my FE buddy up because he wouldn't stop nagging me and I got annoyed with him. Thus, I dove into the research and after two years of embarrassment, I was finally forced to eat crow. A humbling day it was for me.
If you've got 40-minutes to spare, he's Owen Benjamin WILTING away live on camera about 5 years ago as reality begins to set in for him. We all felt this way as the globe slipped away as we couldn't find any solid proofs to shut up these idiotic flat-earthers. It's fun to watch either way if you've got the time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkGHhHwRwYY
And for the record, I don't expect you to come around after a few days, even weeks, maybe months, should you decide to start looking into this yourself. It took me every bit of 2 years for it to set in. Although I'm happy to point you to good resources to use, something Google and YouTube strangely won't do for you...hmmmm?? They bring you psy-ops and fraudsters as their top recommendations for some reason, never once recommending the 5 best researchers...
Anyway, appreciate the chat. Keep that open mind, it will take you a long way!
First point; yes, they would have to point the laser as level as possible, my point relates the laser being straight across the 20 miles, or curved. That's why I'm saying that setup would need to be put in place and kept in place for some time to "average" the discrepancies created by varying temperature, humidity and pressure data. At the scale of a laser Level that is neglible, but over many miles it's not.
Next, the question of the moon is absolutely valid, the way it's locked innplace with the same face pointing towards the earth, even the "scientists" can't adequately explain that.
To the last points; there's a time investment, since this is new, and I'm (in spite of any belief you might have) am not being dismissive.