I saw it multiple times, I believe you guys too. The term “shapeshifters” or “reptilians” or “flat earth” that we saw in various posts here and on other sites.
I will show you how it’s used by the bad guys to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label and slow down awakening.
Example:
”Billy Corgan: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”
https://newspunch.com/billy-corgan-shapeshifting-reptilians/
My reaction to it is:
Add “flat earth” to it and you can easily label all inconvenient truth as “conspiracy theory”.
As simple as that.
They could have done it better this way: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ who live on the opposite side of the Flat Earth Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”.
Recall Pelosi saying on video:
We smear somebody with falsehood and all the rest, then you (journalists) print it and we say: The Press has published that (…) - it legitimises what we said, .. etc.
Talking about “shapeshifters” and “reptilians” is a similar tactic but it’s used to strengthen “conspiracy theorist” label.
When do they need to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label?
-
when the label stops working,
-
when people discover that all previous conspiracy theories came out to be a reality,
-
when we’re winning awakening the masses.
The deep state has to stick some bullshit they can call later so that people won’t believe it, otherwise the “conspiracy theorist” label will stop working at all.
Think about it as a slider that reflects the % of the truth within the “conspiracy theory” space.
-
We prove something was real, we move the slider closer to 100%
-
We say that the difference between the conspiracy theory and the reality was 2 years, 6 months and now it’s 2 months.
-
We’re destroying the term (a weapon) the C_A has created to prevent awakening.
-
They want to move the slider back where it was, closer to 0% so the term (a weapon) can be used again.
It’s NOT about the flat earth or reptilians.
It’s about Awakening.
Everyone who pushes these theories is either unaware or is a shill working for the deep state for money. People who try to justify “we use it to label (them)” are also either unaware or are paid shills who word Kadr to prevent awakening.
When we hear someone like this article and person “witnessing” it (especially famous person) - we have to note it as he isn’t on our side and will betray us. These celebrities are bought to make a contrast between:
- their lies and fake reality they want us to live and believe in,
versus:
- the truth about their pedo perversions, rapes, blackmail and satanic sacrifice.
Once they add something crazy and unreal to the second group - people are more likely to sit in the first box. Be aware of that!
Even if you’re crazy enough to believe that reptilians are real - it’s your choice. But if you really support the Great Awakening - you need to be aware that normies won’t move from the box 1 to box 2 if you add too much for them to accept. Knowing that: avoid flat earth and reptilians terminology here, leave it for yourself for later, if you enjoy it and focus on Great Awakening.
It’s a social engineering, consciously used by the Deep State.
At this stage anyone pushing flat earth and reptilians theories slows down the awakening process, no matter if consciously and intentionally or not.
I’ve made this post quite long and intentionally used the keywords in the title. Some shills will jump in and start calling me names without even reading the whole post. Once you’ve read the whole thing up until here - you understand who can sponsor to push these theories. Let them to reveal themselves, check their posts and their other comments, give your vote to the article and comments. Digital battlefield.
Seeing mountains from great distances is a commonplace occurrence and doesn't really lend itself to these discussions. Case in point, 60 miles accounts for approximately 2100 feet of alleged curvature. So if your mountain is taller than 2100 feet (and assuming your relative elevations are similar) this makes perfect sense that you can see it from that distance "on the globe", and even greater probably. I remember I could see Mt. Shasta (~14,000 feet) on I5 at nearly 100 miles away on clear days which would only account for 6200 feet of alleged curvature.
I presume you're referencing the Owen Benjamin meltdown video. I simply shared that as a hiliarous/painful example of what virtually all of us once experienced. Nobody wants to be a "flat-earther"...even now. And that video is over 5 years old. We knew a whole lot less back in those days.
As to your point, I wholeheartedly disagree. There's no way the "atmosphere" is velcroed to the surface. Every fiber of my being and all the common sense I've accrued to date suggests otherwise. I bought into that argument for about 3 months because everybody else I talked to did too, despite my intuition telling me otherwise. Then one day, I was laying on the beach and watching the clouds moving east to west (against the alleged rotation) at a leisurely pace of 1-2 MPH and watched the birds and the bees effortlessly flying in that same westerly direction as well and I could no longer maintain that absurd idea.
And then I thought about the NY to SF and SF to NY flight times and, like I had known all along but been in deep brainwashed denial about, I knew it would literally be impossible to make the SF to NY flight at 500 MPH with a rotating ball beneath it moving at 800 MPH while the clouds, birds and bees effortlessly traveled in all 4 cardinal directions with the same amount of grace and pace.
And I'll save you the effort should you care to look up what the "experts" have to say on this point. The answer is "no", it's not the same as pouring a drink up in an airplane. This is yet another false equivalency they cabal uses to hold you in the matrix. Being inside the pressurized cabin of a closed-system is NOT THE SAME as the open-system of earth. In order to make each situation equivalent, you need to go sit on the wing of the plane and try to pour your drink. Simple.
The differences are negligible and are entirely due to the prevailing jet streams that can enable the plane to pick up 100MPH when they gain enough altitude.
If you were on a spinning globe, you should be able to fly from NY to SF (~2000 miles) at 500 MPH average airspeed in about an hour and a half as every hour you're covering 1300 miles (+800 for the rotating globe). It's also worth noting that each leg of the trip uses virtually the same amount of fuel. So there's no difference between flying with the spin or against the spin. That makes zero sense of course. It should take ENORMOUSLY MORE power and fuel to push against the velcro'ed rotating atmosphere. Like exponentially more. And, oh yeah, jet airframes would disintegrate if they had to push against an 800 MPH force as they're only integrity rated to about 600 MPH.
None of it makes any sense if you simply stop and think about it. Just look at some clouds. They aren't moving at 802 MPH (800 MPH is a rough estimate of the average speed for the United States. If you live in Ecuador, make that 1037 MPH, +2 MPH for the cloud. You get the gist. Throw out all you've been taught and look up with the innocence of a child. It will all become abundantly clear to you if you do.
Gravity is, and always will be, an unprovable, unmeasurable THEORY. But it's the "Globe savior" for literally dozens of arguments. Nobody disagrees on the 9.8m/Sec^2 math. We suggest that the "force" making "what goes up must come down" is simply electrostatic attraction. And this is quite MEASURABLE and PROVABLE. The higher you rise above the ground, the more positively polarized the ions are. Such that the ground/water generate a tremendous downward pull with its negatively charged ions. This attraction is perfectly explains observable phenomena and can be measured, unlike gravity.
Now, entering into the speculative realms, it's been hypothesized that if we were in fact living in some sort of a "dome" (the waters above and waters below) than we could actually build a working model using two Gaussian plates, above and below, to explain the ionic polarization and electrostatic attraction perfectly. If there's no upper "lid", we can't explain the observed phenomena. Which leads me to believe the dome theory is likely correct.
There are several videos out there which appear to demonstrate some sort of a "force field" that can't be breached. The most famous is the "Go Fast Rocket" demonstration that some amateurs launched several years ago with a camera on it. It traveled over 73 miles up and then Poof, hit "something" that immediately stopped it in its tracks. The previous record was 72 miles. The owners said it did not run out of fuel. Things that make you go hmmmm, yes?
Anyway if there were a dome, naturally it wouldn't be equal heights form all points. It should be lower in areas like Australia, southern Chile, Argentina, etc. and higher as you approach the north pole (on the flat earth model). I've heard some people suggest the max height is 86 miles but I don't know how that person came to that conclusion so it's just pure speculation at this point.
Anyway, here's the video of the GoFast Rocket.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEIG9NiTTwk
What do you think happened?
Well, I have to say that I am simply baffled.
Most of that list of 20 proofs, I might have a counter to, but then most of those counters I might come up with are also addressed. Ex; treating the large scale engineering projects would consider that they would be roughly at the same level at each individual point, so any adjustments for slope are effectively negated.
I'd want to see more detailed model, then would need things addressed like how precession fits in and similar... I'm not jumping ship, but it's safe to say those last few responses have cored a hole in my brain.
And BTW, in case I didn't share it with you already, here's a video from an alleged free mason drawing and explaining the FE model. The majority of us believe in most of it. However, the black sun and continents on the other side of the CD are not even remotely probably at this time. So you've got to take that part with a grain. Albeit, many ancient cultures talk about this black sun as well cultures that live in "inner earth". You can call all that stuff myth and legend if you like. I won't argue with you. But it certainly is intriguing, especially as it's abundantly clear that we're living in a real life "Idiocracy" surrounded by a robotic, ignorant BORG army that has clearly been MISEDUCATED their entire lives.
At any rate, here is a good representation of the "FE model" for your consideration.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SMjVkJaq8w
I once thought so too. If I had a nickel for every one I thought I could debunk...sigh. I'm not dissuading you from trying of course. You gotta do what you gotta do. If you think you've got one you can take to "Flat Earth Dave (.com)" and take his FE challenge. He's been offering 3 bitcoin for over 3 years to anybody who can provide a single scientifically verifiable proof of the globe. You might as well make $60K for your efforts. No need to try and convince a random anon on GA when you can make a quick buck.
Welcome to the "Nobody wanted to be a part of this club" club! Hahahaha.
As I think I've mentioned, when you're ready, you can either:
Well, as to precession, consider, just like the sun and the moon, the "stars" you see aren't giant balls of burning gas trillions of miles away either. There is no proof that there any "rotating objects" so the entire idea of precession can be removed off the back burner and put in the freezer. It's these mental abstractions/conceptualizations that are the hardest things to address. It's far easier to start with a new mental abstraction of what the FE model might look like.
You can pick through videos that capture your interest over here on FE Dave's YouTube page. There are hundreds/thousands. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClWTBNGnjXEZOtEwEp9BGTg/videos
You'll see examples of the FE model throughout. Simply put though, simply imagine a plane (6 continents and 3 oceans) with Antarctica actually being an ice wall enclosing the "pond" we think of as "earth". All that water must have a container, and this is it. The sun and moon are 3300 miles away, most likely lights/projections of some sort, not "things" per se. The sun traverses between the Tropic of Cancer and Capricorn each year (seasons). The center of this plane is the north pole (off limits to the public, just like Antarctica except with cabal-controlled guided tours, neither of which actually take you to the ACTUAL north or south pole. Polaris is the North Star directly over the north pole. And because it's visible, it cannot possibly be trillions, let alone billions, let alone millions of miles away. Most likely it and all the other stars are no greater than thousands of miles away. Oddly, we even have high altitude video from a hot air baloon that rose over 50,000 feet, after which, all the stars actually DISAPPEARED!!!! I know, we're baffled by it too. But we see other footage like the Red Bull jump (125,000 feet) where there are no stars to be seen either. We have no explanation at this time.
The "dome" is an even bigger speculation but I think it's the best current working "model". The reverberating thunder claps, rainbows as a prismatic reflection, the Go Fast Rocket sudden stoppage, video footage of high altitude aircraft appearing to "scrape across" something invisible and making a sort of "wake" in the sky as they appear to skip across it. Not to mention the biblical verse "waters above and waters below", which would require some sort of a container for both. 14th/15th century texts, like those of John Dee, describing a "quarantine field" type belt being placed around the earth. And it would also make the Gaussian plate theory model work perfectly to describe the electrostatic attraction we experience and call "gravity". It all fits to together quite nicely, but remains speculation of course.
Anyway, that's a lot to think about. And this paradigm shift takes much more time than it does information overload. So just settle into it for a few weeks/months and then decide whether you want to keep going down the rabbit hole or not. Because I can assure you of one thing; it sucks to be a "flat earther" in the eyes of the masses and those around you. And it also sucks to hold your tongue and not speak up when you see/hear others deriding it as a lunatic fringe conspiracy theory.
Bottom line, if you decide to take the plunge, you're damned if you do and damned if you don't --- in the eyes of public opinion. I'm an oddball, preferring truth over people's opinion of me. So it was easy for me, having been a now 22 year "conspiracy theorist". I realize that's not the case for most.
I'd only ask that you can do me one single favor. Whichever route you go, hopefully you won't belittle/attack/deride/demean those of us who have taken the plunge now that you're aware of a few things FE related.
Either way, good luck and enjoy the show!
You missed part, say I was watching section 1, I would have an explanation, but then section 5 addresses that explanation (numbers arbitrary, the result is not). That's why I say that I'm baffled, I have no explanation, I mean, I might think up that planes get into a layer of air and their rotation perspective is lost because it's gradual.
Well no, precession is a noted effect, like the pyramids are built to an exceptional level of accuracy, and with a stellar alignment, but not the current day alignment, but more like the alignment of around 10k years ago or around 26k years before that (which also works against the "accepted" view, which would have precession as the Bull, which given the expressed logic would have made the sphinx a bull as opposed to the Lion).
Now, the next challenge is how to address the phases of the moon (which is generally consistent with the direction of the sun), it also must be closer than the sun or eclipses wouldn't work right (unless that plasma moon holds legitimacy, in which case it's just a collision of energies).
Similar though, I've never shied from conspiracy theories since 9-11. It's hard to belittle further when many of the things that I took as self-evident that are just defied in an undeniable way... literally mind melting.
Well, there are answers to all your questions in the video list I've sent you or in a few others. I feel like we've covered enough here. I'll let your own curiosity lead you going forward.
Here are the best FE researcher sites you can use to explore topics of interest:
Jeranism (my favorite guy): https://odysee.com/@jeranism:9 Eric Dubay (father of modern FE) https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c Taboo Conspiracy (Ben): https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c Austin Witsit: https://odysee.com/@WitsitGetsIt:d Flat Earth Dave (David Weiss) #1 (longer vids): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClWTBNGnjXEZOtEwEp9BGTg/videos
Flat Earth Dave (David Weiss) #2 (shorter vids): https://www.youtube.com/c/DITRH/videos
All your questions are answered by the most heavily suppressed and censored FE researchers in the above links. Just search to your heart's content. Seek and ye shall find.
Good luck!
Not trying to spam-bomb you here, but here's a brand new video today which is a great 10-minute SMACKDOWN of how and why we now know the earth is not a globe as described by mainstream authorities.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9N8Sf6znD3w
The fact that these people violently defending the globe despite what is already proven is the most astonishing thing to witness. The score is like 500 to 0 on proofs, but still, these "heliosexuals" won't budge an inch, but rather making greater and greater DEMANDS ON US, of all absurd things, to provide them with a complete and total perfect "FE model". Until then, despite the overwhelming evidence demonstrating the globe is a lie, they won't concede.
I tell ya, it's astonishing to see the degree and magnitude of brainwashing out there. I just can't comprehend it frankly. If these guys had just one thing in their favor I could understand. But they don't. They have reduced themselves to requiring the FE community to deliver them a perfect FE model before they'll concede their PROVEN fraudulent model.
They prefer to live in a world of a PROVABLY fake model over one in which there is no model at all - in a place of curiosity, mystery, awe and wonder. They prefer their cage and jailers over freedom. There must be some sort of a diagnosed psychological condition that explains this. I just don't know what it is...sigh