Great work. You are over the target i think Anon thanks for this breakdown!
A thought I had reading yours: why not run this lady on MSNBC or the MSM? You get more eyeballs then versus CSPAN obviously. But I wonder if they are afraid of the slippery slope associated- they will inform not just the activist sycophants who already hate Q and do whatever the TV box tells them - but also people who have never heard of Q before or know very little beyond the attacks MSM made on Q in 'Round 1' which trailed off and went all quiet on Q before Trump got involved again recently.
With a 2nd exposure people might go check it out finally, see what is the hullabaloo all about. ***unlike back in Round 1 information on Q is EASIER THAN EVER to find due to TruthSocial! I expect it will act like a hub for independent or even Dem normies that want to directly see 'the other side' and so MSM could inadvertently redpill people by pushing the Qanon evil too hard.
I think something similar happened when that crazy Robin DeAngelo bitch started showing up everywhere with her book, which is actually a pile of wet dog feces smeared on paper and then bookbinder, but they treated it like the book "that began the movement" and "the definitive must read source to understand all your new libtard rules and expectations." It ended up destroying interest or belief in their thing and getting people interested and concerned about where else this kind of horse puckey was being disseminated... basically waking middle aged people up to the school indoctrination by way of her workplace version. That's my partial theory anyway.
CSPAN seems to be the place where they can get the false narrative going in a more low key way in case it backfires on them in some fashion, perhaps. They dont want to accidentally awaken a bunch of people who go to study opposition or read forbidden knowledge of the MAGA cult and end up finding it sane and agreeable compared to the attacks they are putting out on it!
What do you say? Am I on base here?
Great work. You are over the target i think Anon thanks for this breakdown!
A thought I had reading yours: why not run this lady on MSNBC or the MSM? You get more eyeballs then versus CSPAN obviously. But I wonder if they are afraid of the slippery slope associated- they will inform not just the activist sycophants who already hate Q and do whatever the TV box tells them - but also people who have never heard of Q before or know very little beyond the attacks MSM made on Q in 'Round 1' which trailed off and went all quiet on Q before Trump got involved again recently.
With a 2nd exposure people might go check it out finally, see what is the hullabaloo all about. ***unlike back in Round 1 information on Q is EASIER THAN EVER to find due to TruthSocial! I expect it will act like a hub for independent or even Dem normies that want to directly see 'the other side' and so MSM could inadvertently redpill people by pushing the Qanon evil too hard.
I think something similar happened when that crazy Robin DeAngelo bitch started showing up everywhere with her book, which is actually a pile of wet dog feces smeared on paper and then bookbinder, but they treated it like the book "that began the movement" and "the definitive must read source to understand all your new libtard rules and expectations." It ended up destroying interest or belief in their thing and getting people interested and concerned about where else this kind of horse puckey was being disseminated... basically waking middle aged people up to the school indoctrination by way of her workplace version. That's my partial theory anyway.
CSPAN seems to be the place where they can get the false narrative going in a more low key way in case it backfires on them in some fashion, perhaps. They dont want to accidentally awaken a bunch of people who go to study opposition or read forbidden knowledge of the MAGA cult and end up finding it sane and agreeable compared to the attacks they are putting out on it! What do you say? Am I on base here?