So the Nagasaki bomb was real, but the Tsar bomb is fake? And the suitcase nukes are real, but security on them has been 100% effective? Nuclear reactors on cruisers were safe, but nuclear reactors on land are not.
No 3-eyed fish from 3-mile island, no mutated fish from anywhere in the Pacific after Fukushima, no birth defects around Chernobyl or the other cities above? What they publish about nuclear power is riddled with contradictions that cannot all be true.
The symbolism links cannot be proven by their nature. But sure, it's a coincidence that Alone Gay flew the same time as Hiram Johnson died, ending opposition to open alliance with the USSR. And it's coincidence that the next plane's name sounds like boxcar, and so it could not possibly have been a reference to the trans-Siberian railroad's recent completion, facilitating a USSR front against Japan. And it's coincidence that the nuclear symbol looks like a film reel, and coincidence that the #1 symbol of scantily clad ladies is just a tribute to a nuclear test site, and has nothing to do with compromising prominent politicians.
Man, are you jumping to unwarranted conclusions. The Tsar Bomba was real and was detonated, but it was an experiment (it was designed for 100 MT, but they relented and removed the uranium tamper final stage...good idea, the carrier plane barely escaped the blast), and they concluded it was more trouble than it was worth. No evidence of poor security on the "suitcase" bombs (which weighed upwards of 250 pounds). Nuclear reactors are safe on submarines and aircraft carriers, and can be also on land (but submarines are built and operate to more stringent standards, thanks to Admiral Rickover).
What 3-eyed fish? 3-Mile island didn't emit much (if any) radioactivity. Not aware of any mutated fish from Fukushima (which also produced very little radioactivity---just because they can measure it against a non-noisy background doesn't mean it was much to begin with). Birth defects from Chernobyl were close to normal, if not normal. Cancer rates were not elevated. "They" is not a single individual. You have to read the source material and learn the subject. Plenty of axes to grind, and the progressive greens should not be trusted to be truthful.
Coincidences happen all the time (thus, the term). When the Enola Gay flew, servicemen were being killed in the Pacific campaign. Wouldn't that have been meaningful? I don't know Hiram Johnson from anyone---and what's to stop him from dying when he wanted to? Or from anything else happening at the same time? The second plane was named after the flight commander, Capt. Frederick C. Bock (obviously a pun on "Bock's Car"). It was painted on it after the mission. So it could NOT possibly have been a reference to the trans-Siberian railway. But I am sure that some housewife pulled a pie out of the oven at the completion of the railway. (And you are aware, are you not, that Nagasaki was not the primary target anyway?) And it is a coincidence that someone can see a film reel in the symbol, just as someone can see a toadstool (or a toad) in a Rorschach blot.
I have no idea what your remark about "scantily clad ladies" has to do with trinitite. Were you possibly referring to Bikini Atoll? Those were the days when nuclear testing was sensational news, and people would jump on a snappy association. There is even a decor style named after it: "Atomic Age."
You are letting your imagination run away with you. Stick to the facts and you will be sane.
So the Nagasaki bomb was real, but the Tsar bomb is fake? And the suitcase nukes are real, but security on them has been 100% effective? Nuclear reactors on cruisers were safe, but nuclear reactors on land are not.
No 3-eyed fish from 3-mile island, no mutated fish from anywhere in the Pacific after Fukushima, no birth defects around Chernobyl or the other cities above? What they publish about nuclear power is riddled with contradictions that cannot all be true.
The symbolism links cannot be proven by their nature. But sure, it's a coincidence that Alone Gay flew the same time as Hiram Johnson died, ending opposition to open alliance with the USSR. And it's coincidence that the next plane's name sounds like boxcar, and so it could not possibly have been a reference to the trans-Siberian railroad's recent completion, facilitating a USSR front against Japan. And it's coincidence that the nuclear symbol looks like a film reel, and coincidence that the #1 symbol of scantily clad ladies is just a tribute to a nuclear test site, and has nothing to do with compromising prominent politicians.
Man, are you jumping to unwarranted conclusions. The Tsar Bomba was real and was detonated, but it was an experiment (it was designed for 100 MT, but they relented and removed the uranium tamper final stage...good idea, the carrier plane barely escaped the blast), and they concluded it was more trouble than it was worth. No evidence of poor security on the "suitcase" bombs (which weighed upwards of 250 pounds). Nuclear reactors are safe on submarines and aircraft carriers, and can be also on land (but submarines are built and operate to more stringent standards, thanks to Admiral Rickover).
What 3-eyed fish? 3-Mile island didn't emit much (if any) radioactivity. Not aware of any mutated fish from Fukushima (which also produced very little radioactivity---just because they can measure it against a non-noisy background doesn't mean it was much to begin with). Birth defects from Chernobyl were close to normal, if not normal. Cancer rates were not elevated. "They" is not a single individual. You have to read the source material and learn the subject. Plenty of axes to grind, and the progressive greens should not be trusted to be truthful.
Coincidences happen all the time (thus, the term). When the Enola Gay flew, servicemen were being killed in the Pacific campaign. Wouldn't that have been meaningful? I don't know Hiram Johnson from anyone---and what's to stop him from dying when he wanted to? Or from anything else happening at the same time? The second plane was named after the flight commander, Capt. Frederick C. Bock (obviously a pun on "Bock's Car"). It was painted on it after the mission. So it could NOT possibly have been a reference to the trans-Siberian railway. But I am sure that some housewife pulled a pie out of the oven at the completion of the railway. (And you are aware, are you not, that Nagasaki was not the primary target anyway?) And it is a coincidence that someone can see a film reel in the symbol, just as someone can see a toadstool (or a toad) in a Rorschach blot.
I have no idea what your remark about "scantily clad ladies" has to do with trinitite. Were you possibly referring to Bikini Atoll? Those were the days when nuclear testing was sensational news, and people would jump on a snappy association. There is even a decor style named after it: "Atomic Age."
You are letting your imagination run away with you. Stick to the facts and you will be sane.