🤡🌎 10. Identify all circumstances surrounding your relationship with Ron Watkins (aka Code Monkey Z, aka Q), including, but not limited to, when and how you met, Mr. Watkins’ involvement with the Cyber Symposium, and your knowledge of Mr. Watkins’ involvement with the QAnon conspiracy theory. - The Great Awakening

186

🤡🌎 10. Identify all circumstances surrounding your relationship with Ron Watkins (aka Code Monkey Z, aka Q), including, but not limited to, when and how you met, Mr. Watkins’ involvement with the Cyber Symposium, and your knowledge of Mr. Watkins’ involvement with the QAnon conspiracy theory. 🧐 Research Wanted 🤔

posted 2 years ago by CHAOS_ACTUAL 2 years ago by CHAOS_ACTUAL +186 / -0

"Oh, what a tangled web we weave..."

Above excerpted from DEFENDANTS MICHAEL J. LINDELL, FRANKSPEECH, LLC, AND MY PILLOW’S INC.’S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO, Judge Nina Y. Wang, Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-01129-NYW-SKC

ERIC COOMER, PH.D., Plaintiff,

MICHAEL J. LINDELL, FRANKSPEECH LLC, and MY PILLOW, INC.

I'm not sure if it is the Coomer v. Lindell et al. or the Tina Peters case (both being adjudicated in Colorado) is the one in which the judge approved the warrant for the confiscation of Mike Lindell's phone and the 🤡 show that ensued. Seems more likely it was the case against Tina Peters since Jena Griswold, Secretary of State of Colorado would have the leverage to get the FBI involved. Lindell's phone was confiscated shortly after Tina Peters phone was confiscated, and I am pretty sure I remember here saying in was because of the Coomer lawsuit. Either way, 🤡🌎.

[... ensued. Did you see what I did there? ... ensued = end-sued = BOHICA)

From Attachment 1, Exhibit 1, page number 22, item 10. .
(Exhibit 1 is composed of multiple separate filings - so disregard text pagination and use overall document page number to locate this extracted item.)

Link Attachment 1 of Main Document 57 filed 28 September 2022
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.215068/gov.uscourts.cod.215068.57.1.pdf

Link Main Document 57 filed 28 September 2022 / Lindell Motion to Stay Discovery
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.215068/gov.uscourts.cod.215068.57.0.pdf

Backstory:

Eric Coomer's most recent amended complaint:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.215068/gov.uscourts.cod.215068.21.0.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_Voting_Systems#Coomer_lawsuit

https://www.worldtribune.com/who-is-eric-coomer-part-ii-bizarre-arrest-video-of-dominion-voting-exec-in-colorado/ (part II contains part I)

Body Cam Footage of Eric Coomer Being Arrested In Salida Colorado and Lies To Police.
https://youtu.be/9vUUHFCTRjw

Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ], [Mar 1, 2022 at 10:35 AM] Eric Coomer, Dominion CEO, tells police to "google his name" as he sits cuffed in a police cruiser.
https://twitter.com/Jamram171/status/1498689122461966342

https://worldtribune.com/life/who-is-eric-coomer-of-dominion-voting-systems/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jena_Griswold

Colorado Secretary Of State: Mesa County Clerk Allowed 'Troubling’ Security Breach In Elections Office 12 August 2021 (same day as Lindell Cyber Symposium Day 3)
https://youtu.be/ssztJRAVGpM

87 comments

87 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (87)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– Well_Shave_MY_Taint 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

The reference is to the “headline” of the post. Just wasn’t clear what context the question posed was. ‘Scuse the frustrated tone please. Know we’re all part of the same team, just happened to come across it and let fly.

Just wished that the initial question posed could have been given context up top. Is it an interrogatory posed in a deposition yet to be answered? who is asking the question? what is the question’s context? Where is this question being posed?

First to admit, no expert here, too slow witted and impatient— bad combo. I get it.

BUT…consider the new site visitor looking for something solid and substancial coming across a typical forum post. (On any board, not picking on this one any more) The submission from this corner is that it tends to leave one somewhat frustrated. (But it’s the price we all pay thanks to the losers in the MSM being such shills for the politically connected and the comfortable.

The average reader when presented with a lengthy block of text will surf on…(kinda like many folks reading this response :-). But if the “title” or “headline” doesn’t make it clear why someone should be interested in investing such a scare resource as their time, a potential new anon could be lost.

IMO these types of posts being “featured” really need to be looked over by a third set of eyes. If it’s to be featured, the poster should consider distilling to its very essence, break it down into more easily digestible bites of text. Back in the day, an editor would help the writer discern their intent and help them make it more clear to the time-pressed. Too bad those days are long gone. I miss ‘em.

I personally don’t mind reading docs. Not clear at the outset exactly what’s going on here so would really appreciate any help the big brains can provide to us ‘tards.

Finally, legal battles tend to drag on, go back and forth, filings, counter filings and such. The “when” element in legal matters seems to get buried or lost. Since lawyers these days get to bill in 1/10th hours, they do love to drag things out.

permalink parent save report block reply