[They] figured out long ago that short, 2-word or 3-word slogans are accepted by people if there is any sense of something "scientific" behind it. Most won't bother to really find out, but they will be assured that they are doing the right thing by believing in it.
There is no need for critical thinking or analysis. "Global cooling." "Global warming." "Climate change." "Social distancing." "Safe for democracy." "Lesser of 2 evils."
None of these slogans mean anything of substance, but they are easy to digest and the non-thinker can believe he is doing the right thing by going along.
Unfortunately, I don't think we can come up with alternative slogans that will win the battle. That is because we don't have the resources to push the propaganda.
But we do have the single most valuable tool on our side: THE TRUTH.
We have to catch the normie by surprise, to get them to question what we said, and THEN we can deliver the information to explain in 1 minute or less, what the overview is.
So, I think using a made-up term that they have never heard would be the tool to get them to pay attention.
Me: I think it is really important that we practice climate rescue.
Normie: Climate rescue? What's that?
Me: Well, petroleum is sitting in the Earth's crust. When we pull it out of the Earth, we are pulling out carbon from beneath the surface. Then, we burn that carbon as fuel, which releases it into the air. This is actually good for the environment, not bad. That's because plants must have carbon dioxide to survive. in fact, commercial growers add extra carbon dioxide into their greenhouses to make the plants grow bigger and faster. If plants don't have enough carbon dioxide, they will die, and so will all of life on Earth. In fact, 18,000 years ago, the level of CO2 got so low, that plants at the top of the mountains started to die off, and almost all life on Earth went extinct. But for whatever reason, the CO2 levels started to rise again, and the plants did fine. It is probably because the oceans store most of the excess carbon that is not needed in the atmostphere, and they can store it or release it, as needed. We humans are not causing a CO2 problem at all. In fact, we are helping to rescue the planet by taking the carbon from underground and putting it into the air, which helps the plants, and then the plants help the animals by releasing oxygen. The climate change fraud is to control people and steal their wealth through global taxation. We need to protect ourselves from these conmen.
Cute slogans are not going to do it. Red pilling is the only way.
We need to stop calling it 'climate change' and start calling it 'climate political tyranny'.
... If someone can think of a better, more catchy term, you're more than welcome to.
I call it 'climate change crap'. 😸
I call it weather.
😸😸😸
Which it is.
[They] figured out long ago that short, 2-word or 3-word slogans are accepted by people if there is any sense of something "scientific" behind it. Most won't bother to really find out, but they will be assured that they are doing the right thing by believing in it.
There is no need for critical thinking or analysis. "Global cooling." "Global warming." "Climate change." "Social distancing." "Safe for democracy." "Lesser of 2 evils."
None of these slogans mean anything of substance, but they are easy to digest and the non-thinker can believe he is doing the right thing by going along.
Unfortunately, I don't think we can come up with alternative slogans that will win the battle. That is because we don't have the resources to push the propaganda.
But we do have the single most valuable tool on our side: THE TRUTH.
We have to catch the normie by surprise, to get them to question what we said, and THEN we can deliver the information to explain in 1 minute or less, what the overview is.
So, I think using a made-up term that they have never heard would be the tool to get them to pay attention.
Cute slogans are not going to do it. Red pilling is the only way.
The-climate-clap.