This is an absolutely useless statistic. It doesn't prove a thing.
Why? Because the characteristics of vaxxed group are FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT than the unvaxxed group.
How so? The elderly were far more likely to get vaxxed (as were immuno-compromised, etc), and therefore the 'vaxxed group' are far more likely to die simply because of advanced age, existing sickness, etc.
Personally, I think the shots are terrible, but be very careful when getting hyped about statistics. They very often lie.
I'm glad to hear that. Most of the statistics are so obfuscated that it is impossible to extract anything meaningful.
Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to quantify how much more 'baseline-sickly' the vaxxed group is (because the sickly were pushed harder, and have stories like 'I am immuno-compromised, so my doctor told me I REALLY need to take the vaxx', etc).
Also, 'scared' people (the ones who are more likely to get vaxxed) are more likely to die (especially with a constant barrage of fear-messaging from the MSM). I have NO idea how much this would skew numbers -- I'm just saying that it's a factor.
Still, the age bracketed data helps make the findings more significant. Thanks for pointing that out.
You got downdooted for being skeptical?! That's the main reason this community exists. Your response to being informed of the bracketed data was dignified and civil. We need more of that.
He got downvoted for not even bothering to read the article before commenting. the Age segregated information is contained in the article. Maybe you should also try reading the subject matter before commenting.
This is an absolutely useless statistic. It doesn't prove a thing.
Why? Because the characteristics of vaxxed group are FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT than the unvaxxed group.
How so? The elderly were far more likely to get vaxxed (as were immuno-compromised, etc), and therefore the 'vaxxed group' are far more likely to die simply because of advanced age, existing sickness, etc.
Personally, I think the shots are terrible, but be very careful when getting hyped about statistics. They very often lie.
Bill gates favorite book. How to lie with statistics.
Read the article. They have age bracketed data.
I'm glad to hear that. Most of the statistics are so obfuscated that it is impossible to extract anything meaningful.
Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to quantify how much more 'baseline-sickly' the vaxxed group is (because the sickly were pushed harder, and have stories like 'I am immuno-compromised, so my doctor told me I REALLY need to take the vaxx', etc).
Also, 'scared' people (the ones who are more likely to get vaxxed) are more likely to die (especially with a constant barrage of fear-messaging from the MSM). I have NO idea how much this would skew numbers -- I'm just saying that it's a factor.
Still, the age bracketed data helps make the findings more significant. Thanks for pointing that out.
You got downdooted for being skeptical?! That's the main reason this community exists. Your response to being informed of the bracketed data was dignified and civil. We need more of that.
Thanks for the comment.
We are facing unprecedented evil in this world. We need to fight it with real facts, and there are plenty of solid facts to fight with...
If a normie can dismiss our 'evidence' (as easily as I did), then we need to shift our attention to solid, unquestionable evidence.
Just trying to help the cause...
He got downvoted for not even bothering to read the article before commenting. the Age segregated information is contained in the article. Maybe you should also try reading the subject matter before commenting.
This is why I come here
So you didnt read the entire article? The part where it breaks it down in different age groups?