I no longer trust these types of injections.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (72)
sorted by:
Rabies isn't 100% fatal, just close. There are currently 29 survivors that have been reported.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7266186/
That being said, Rabies is no joke and is extremely dangerous. Tetanus is also a big no-fun time, so I would take both the rabies treatment and tetanus shots. These are real and life threatening. Not all medicine is crap. Some was and is developed by people trying to make the world a better place. Not every researcher and doctor is an evil dick tool of a global conspiracy. A lot are and many more are simply brainwashed, but most are believing they are doing the right thing, but simply not intelligent enough to recognize they are manipulated. Much of what we believe about the world is a fabrication. We have all been affected by it, the key is to recognize that we may have been affected and make smart informed decisions based on observation , research and reason on a case by case basis.
Oh, and back on the main topic...hell no to flu vaccines and any other vaccines or any treatment by western medicine that you haven't personally researched to your own satisfaction.
Thanks for the link but doesn’t it say the article has been retracted? Also, I believe the definitive diagnosis is autopsy of the brain tissue looking for the presence of Negri Bodies. So, if someone had rabies and survive there wouldn’t be a definitive diagnosis. Regardless, it’s close enough to 100% that I would take that shot. And you are correct, there are Dr’s that genuinely want to help people. I read on this very site about a gentleman who’s great aunt died of the Salk polio vaccine and Dr Salk personally signed her death certificate. Now that takes integrity! You think Dr “Mengle” Fauci would sign the death certificates of those who died from the clot shot?
The reason for retraction was because of some of the refernced data and tables were not permitted by the original sources. It was not due to any errors in the material.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284244/?report=reader
Retractions of articles can be for a multitude of reasons that are unrelated to the core of the material.
As human beings, we strive for simplicity in our world views. We yearn for clear and concise lines between Good and Evil, Right and Wrong. The fairy tales and stories we create provide these concise lines as a clear example of model behavior. Unfortunately, our world is far more complicated and the lines are blurry. People of honor have a moral code that draw their own lines, based on environmental pressures and examples and personal experience. People of conviction stick to these guides and make no exceptions except in the most arduous of conditions and zealots make no exceptions, regardless of the conditions and regardless of the consequences. The other end of the spectrum is people who have no moral values and have no clear lines of conduct. Either extreme can be extremely dangerous. I believe we should all strive to be people of conviction and avoid the other two extremes.