The Fake News is building a giant Trojan horse before our eyes.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
IMHO, Tulsi Gabbard is opposite of MAGA. She represents the ideology from the CFR to the letter. There should be no surprise that Gabbard is a CFR member.
I agree with you that "it might be relevant in the future". It seems many people here on GAW are posting quite a bit concerning Tulsi Gabbard. The Mockingbird News sure seems to be infatuated with Tulsi Gabbard right now. To me, the build-up always of a MSM narrative seems to lead to 'some' kinetic consequence later on. Would you not agree the likes of Tucker Carlson and the Fake News is busy building this Trojan horse though?
Prior to 2013, Tulsi Gabbard was being paraded all over on the media talk circuit similar to as she is now. It culminated in her being voted overwhelmingly as the vice chair of the DNC. All of this was to build her resume and exposure in front of the American public and eventually position her to run for president. However, Tulsi Gabbard made the mistake of crossing-the-line when she criticized chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and that queen witch, Hillary Clinton during the presidential primary. Gabbard almost mistakenly opened a can of worms for the Clinton machine and the DNC. So bad was her offense that Tulsi Gabbard resigned her DNC vice chair position in 2016. A cat-fight ensued to which Gabbard released a statement about the heated and public disagreements surrounding the debates in a Facebook post in 2015. Who says Tulsi Gabbard never gets angry? Her persona is well crafted and all an act. Following her public criticisms, Gabbard was reported to have been either "disinvited" or asked to "consider not coming" to the October 13, 2015, Democratic debate in Las Vegas. She fell from grace and was shunned by the democrats.
It appears Tulsi Gabbard has become tired of being ostracized by her fellow democrats. This is after voting pretty much in lock-step with the democrats for many years hoping to be forgiven. She has now decided to take a page from Senator Joe Manchin and copy the same act as Manchin did only a few months ago. Remember when Manchin was going to leave the democrat party? The hype Tulsi Gabbard is now getting from the MSM is far different than what Joe Manchin got. Why do you suppose that is?
It appears to me that Tulsi Gabbard is useful after all in a different way than Senator Joe Manchin is. Already the Daily Mail in the UK is reporting that Tulsi Gabbard has taken 3rd place in the republican polls as the favorite candidate. WTH? Whether The Daily Mail piece is true or not is collateral to the evidence Gabbard is indeed being hyped. Mike Pence was originally the Deep State's favorite, but then Ron DeSantis started to really make a name for himself with Republicans. Now, it appears the Deep State is conjuring up another candidate they hope the Republicans, Independents,and 'walk-away' democrats will all support. And look who Tulsi Gabbard just endorsed a MAGA candidate.
The implications of the Deep State 'creating' her as the 'safe' choice between the much maligned "all too dangerous-to-our-democracy" MAGA candidate (Ergo, Donald Trump) and the all too woke left candidate (ergo, Joe Biden/ Kamala Harris) is IMHO, something to contemplate and be aware of. I'm betting Tulsi Gabbard is going to run for president. She did it before. She won't run as a republican, but most likely as a democrat. She herself said she is now an "independent" democrat. That wording sounds like what Senator Joe Manchin said. How much this will work is something that might be [very] relevant in future.
We cannot under estimate the power of someone like Tulsi to be able to redpill a lot of people on the left and on the fence. Remember, they will close their ears and scream "lalalala" if someone who is fully conservative talks to them.
What defines Tulsi is whether she will "evolve" as she redpills people. Start with Ukraine. Once she has enough people on left listening to her, drop a crumb about abortion or gun control. Prep the people to be open to alternate views in what they consider absolutely uncompromisable issues.
On the other hand, if she starts getting a large MAGA following (highly unlikely) and then she starts hinting CBDC is good etc, then we know she is working for the clowns.