For sure - I'm all for digging, ideas, scrutiny... my comments were aimed at both ends of the "Bro" spectrum. Those who think she's instantly MAGA and the future of the USA vs. those who claim she's WEF and never to be trusted.
Point being, trust, whether old or new, needs to be earned. No sense in participating in a hypothetical tug of war about someone when we can just keep eyes on and see where her actions take her.
Lol. I agree with you. Just taking the small win from her "transition" and that is all... still a Dem in my mind. Just not getting involved in the drama & guessing games.
She's not new. She has a voting record and a political record, and a military record in psyops.
When you're running for the highest office in the land, the scrutiny is justified.
Absolutely. A few words don't nullify years of past history. Too many have been fooled by that tactic many times.
For sure - I'm all for digging, ideas, scrutiny... my comments were aimed at both ends of the "Bro" spectrum. Those who think she's instantly MAGA and the future of the USA vs. those who claim she's WEF and never to be trusted.
Point being, trust, whether old or new, needs to be earned. No sense in participating in a hypothetical tug of war about someone when we can just keep eyes on and see where her actions take her.
She can never earn the trust at this point. It’s like saying someone like Hillary can change her ways and become an anon
Lol. I agree with you. Just taking the small win from her "transition" and that is all... still a Dem in my mind. Just not getting involved in the drama & guessing games.