I got to be honest, I'm not really invested in either side of the debate on her allegiances.
Ultimately, these figures are distractions and will fade as quickly as they come about.
Remember what happened to Lin Wood?
Once upon a time everyone was posting his hot takes, linking to his telegram, etc.
Then there was a whole beef with Flynn.
Now... crickets...
This is my opinion on Tulsi Gabbard: she's just like every other politician.
Remember this single fact when considering allegiances...
You don't play the game without getting dirty.
Every politician is guilty of working for the Cabal by default. Only outsiders should be viewed with any modicum of loyalty to the Constitution, and only after they've proven themselves by being rejected by 99% of the System, including the full force of the Main Stream Media Beast.
Even then, skepticism is appropriate. Once you begin to "trust" someone above and beyond reason, that's when they are most likely to stab you in the back.
Everything is a scheme, a plan, a rig, and optics. Tulsi was comfortable where she was. What does she have to gain by making this play? That's the question you should be asking right now, with the highest degree of cynicism.
How does leaving the DNC benefit her?
She knew the MSM would attack and smear her, it's the obvious result. What suddenly made that bad publicity worth it?
Why are they pushing her defection?
What would the Cabal have to gain by smearing her and emphasizing her association with the WEF?
These questions need answers before anyone should take a side for or against Tulsi Gabbard.
As it stands, I'll retain my default position in that she's just dirty as the rest of them.
I hope this rambling helps in your discernment of the situation.
Big money was behind her run for president, with the destruction of the democrat party imminent, that big money wants a return and the only place they will get it in the next 40 years is not democrat. But that ain't maga and she's just a another snake in the grass.
That may just be the most likely reason. They need to make a new party, and Tulsi Gabbard might be the moderate which the new party could hang their hat on. Good theory.
My question is: why do we need to choose sides now? What's wrong with taking a "wait and see" approach? Let the situation sort itself out. It will become obvious which side she's on soon enough.
I'm glad if Tulsi Gabbard has finally seen the light. Now she can retire in peace and never hold public office again.
If she stays in politics, then she is just another rotten swamp creature not to be trusted.
I agree that we can't really know -- certainly not at this point -- what is in Tulsi's heart. She could be anything from sincere to a mole to a triple agent. We'll learn the truth at some point, but not this week.
In the meantime, what she's DOING is helping us greatly. She's well-known and admired by millions, including by many who are probably on the fence. By giving voice to truths that many normies have not yet fully embraced, she has become a formidable red-pill machine.
Most of US are on the fence about her (or worse) but we aren't the ones who need to hear what she is saying. Normies are the ones who need a push to finally embrace reality -- to really let in the truth about what the Dems / DS are doing to America and the world, and Tulsi is giving them that push.
I don't know if she's truly MAGA but I am certain she is helping our cause for now, no matter her motives.
From her perspective she’s got two ways to go now. Either it works out and she gets to rule with satan. OR she will try to claim innocence and leave the situation before it gets too out of hand. She may even be hailed as a hero, because speaking the truth is revolutionary in a totalitarian society.
See above
A lot. The WEF are bad and powerful but the cabal is rich enough to throw all of them under the bus and still live good.
They want to reinvent themselves anyway and go from the old world order to the new world order. The WEF will just be another reason to not look back.
She’s a well spoken, slightly attractive woman to many people. She’s got a personality, a military background, and is more of a Yang democrat who speaks against woke bs. She’ll be a Ross Perot type candidate.
This is just my opinion, but I think she’s controlled opposition and probably a man.
It doesn't cost me a dime to sit back and watch what happens
I believe her story is noise and not signal.
On one hand, she sees the writing on the wall. This is a desperate move to save her ass.
On the other hand, she’s been a white hat infiltrator (look at her military history).
Or, it’s neither. 🤷♀️
Honestly, it’s just more noise from a mid-level Dem. I’m just gonna sit back and watch this one. 🍿🍿🍿
Just a thought...Has anyone considered that she may have been planted in the dems corner (infiltration) and now she is back on the right side? I remember the debates and thought she was a pretty strong candidate but for some reason the DNC downplayed her popularity. Only time will tell whether she is now a RINO or was a DINO or whether she is just fed up with the whole system like all the rest of us and wants to achieve what is best for the country.
We will know soon enough if she is a plant, but so could hillary be a plant.
Hillary is more like a weed, and not the good kind!
I agree, I will be so disappointed if she's a white hat when I so wanted to see those treason charges.
It’s like our church It was fairly anti COVID and fought local government to bend the rules and work around them to stay open. And now that that’s all over all the politicians are attending it regularly as there’s an election coming. Posers gonna pose.
The dems are a sinking ship. What better to rebrand than use tulsi as the “sensible lib”. Steer the moderate sheep away from MAGA. Having said that, people can change. Who she endorses in the midterms will show where her alliance is at.