Your dad was in Nagasaki so you know all about nuclear, you worked for Boeing for over 40 years, the media doesn't lie much at all, and we can trust 99% of science and history.
We've discovered all the above "facts" about you because you used them to establish credibility on why you are right and anons are wrong. This is what larpers do.
And Q confirmed Epstein was the first arrest, so of course you post nonsense like this in an attempt to derail actual news-
I have been forthright and honest. All you are doing is sniping. And misquoting what I say. Of course the media lies incessantly; I haven't bothered to read newspapers for the past 40 years on account of that. But other information is reliable. History requires a lot of reading, and science a lot of learning.
You don't know squat about me. I surmise it is a frustration to you. But I have offered information that is correct and comes out of my area of competence. Some anons are wrong because they have indulged their own fantasies to the exclusion of realism. I have pointed out their errors and lapses. I don't expect that would make them happy with me. Too bad. Live and learn.
As for Epstein, his arrest was satisfactory, so far as it went, but allowing him to be murdered was not satisfactory. And, in general, the whole affair was a nothingburger. I was aware of who and what he was, but, frankly, I am not impressed with anything that was accomplished. If he was the "first arrest," was that disinformation? Can you deny that arresting Trump would get the world's attention? Don't place too much weight on a speculation, presented as such. Anons do that too much with speculations, as a basic reflex.
I am live-action. But I am not role-playing (this is the real me) and I don't take the fate of the nation as a game. So, I will agree I am a "la" but no different than you or any other anon.
Why not? You seem to think that certain things are impossible. (By the way, it was only 40 years. I made sure it was not a day more.) By your handle, one might suppose you are accustomed to prayer---but I make no such assumptions.
Your dad was in Nagasaki so you know all about nuclear, you worked for Boeing for over 40 years, the media doesn't lie much at all, and we can trust 99% of science and history.
We've discovered all the above "facts" about you because you used them to establish credibility on why you are right and anons are wrong. This is what larpers do.
And Q confirmed Epstein was the first arrest, so of course you post nonsense like this in an attempt to derail actual news-
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTtuDLSZ/and-ladies-and-gentlemen-the-fir/
I have been forthright and honest. All you are doing is sniping. And misquoting what I say. Of course the media lies incessantly; I haven't bothered to read newspapers for the past 40 years on account of that. But other information is reliable. History requires a lot of reading, and science a lot of learning.
You don't know squat about me. I surmise it is a frustration to you. But I have offered information that is correct and comes out of my area of competence. Some anons are wrong because they have indulged their own fantasies to the exclusion of realism. I have pointed out their errors and lapses. I don't expect that would make them happy with me. Too bad. Live and learn.
As for Epstein, his arrest was satisfactory, so far as it went, but allowing him to be murdered was not satisfactory. And, in general, the whole affair was a nothingburger. I was aware of who and what he was, but, frankly, I am not impressed with anything that was accomplished. If he was the "first arrest," was that disinformation? Can you deny that arresting Trump would get the world's attention? Don't place too much weight on a speculation, presented as such. Anons do that too much with speculations, as a basic reflex.
I am live-action. But I am not role-playing (this is the real me) and I don't take the fate of the nation as a game. So, I will agree I am a "la" but no different than you or any other anon.
You worked for Boeing for over 40 years yet you know what larper stands for and put this much effort into a response.
Right.
Why not? You seem to think that certain things are impossible. (By the way, it was only 40 years. I made sure it was not a day more.) By your handle, one might suppose you are accustomed to prayer---but I make no such assumptions.