Both references, Starfish Prime and Salvatore Pais, are referrences to an Electro-magnetic Pulse (EMP). Prime was the first high level nuclear explosion which created an EMP. Such a device exploded over say, the United States would knock out electronic devices line-of-sight effectively send is back to the 50's overnight. Salvatore Pais has a patent, US10135366B2. It is a power source with an interesting side effect, EMP. Would it be possible to create a portable EMP device? Point and shoot....
Regardless of which side you are on, we must truly be going in the right direction if you are here. God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are working together with our prayers
Just because someone has a patent, does not mean that the thing patented has been reduced to practice. I have 9 patents, and none of them have been built (though I think they could be). Salvatore Pais has a lot to prove, and a patent is not proof of anything. It's not even evidence. At best, it is a property claim and/or an argument.
It would only give you funding. It wouldn't make R&D easier (look at the history of the controlled fusion program). And even if the principle had been demonstrated by prototype examples, the idea can be quashed for other reasons (e.g., the Orion pulse propulsion concept).
I was once working with a team that was getting ready to build megawatt-class carbon monoxide electric discharge lasers (COEDLs) for weapon systems. We were in competition with Northrop. But that whole technology was bypassed when the Air Force decided to develop the chemical oxygen-iodine laser (COIL). So, you never know what the fate of an idea will be.
There is a mental process on this page that tends to go in the direction of: "It's conceivable" => "it's possible" => "it's probable" => "it's in development" => "it's a secret weapon!" When the real answer is: bumpkis. Be skeptical of super technology being touted. The stuff that is talked about is unlikely. The stuff that is likely is not talked about.
Your dad was in Nagasaki so you know all about nuclear, you worked for Boeing for over 40 years, the media doesn't lie much at all, and we can trust 99% of science and history.
We've discovered all the above "facts" about you because you used them to establish credibility on why you are right and anons are wrong. This is what larpers do.
And Q confirmed Epstein was the first arrest, so of course you post nonsense like this in an attempt to derail actual news-
No, but they were put forward by the Boeing Company and vetted by their patent staff. It may occur to you that a company like Boeing does not bother with pursuit of patents if they think they have no potential business value.
The patents could be signed by anyone. It wouldn't change the facts of what I said.
There’s some really interesting information on how a general(?) stepped into the patent process to verify to the patent office that, yes, is fact, this patent was fully functional.
I don’t have a link for that at the moment, but could possibly find it this afternoon and report back.
Unfortunately, we live in times where creatures like Rachel Levine are accepted as women and allowed to wear a uniform, so the say-so of a ranking officer might be of interest, but only because of throwing rank around.
My skepticism is also based in the fact that a patent is a public disclosure. If so, where is the scientific evidence? No reason to keep public information secret.
Rachel Levine,,, oh hell I haven’t thought about that freak show in awhile..
I pretty much think she was purposely put there as part of the show. Im thinking that freak was told she will be taking that position by white hats and she better keep that worn out mouth shut or she’ll find herself in Club Gitmo for the rest of “her(?)” weird life.
Both references, Starfish Prime and Salvatore Pais, are referrences to an Electro-magnetic Pulse (EMP). Prime was the first high level nuclear explosion which created an EMP. Such a device exploded over say, the United States would knock out electronic devices line-of-sight effectively send is back to the 50's overnight. Salvatore Pais has a patent, US10135366B2. It is a power source with an interesting side effect, EMP. Would it be possible to create a portable EMP device? Point and shoot....
Interesting line of thinking. Not the one that’s being implied though.
We’re loving the amount of discussion and digging going on in this thread.
Who is "we"?
Me and the other watchers.
As in book of Enoch watchers?
Things that make you go hmmmm
I was wondering who "we" was also.
Pfft... google "Is WE getting a stumliz check" to find out.
I say we all the time when I mean me and my wife.
I had to rattle everyones head this week to get back to GAWs roots. 😆😆😆
OG’s thank you!
That was fun to watch. Keks
Regardless of which side you are on, we must truly be going in the right direction if you are here. God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are working together with our prayers
Yeah. The 1850s.
Just because someone has a patent, does not mean that the thing patented has been reduced to practice. I have 9 patents, and none of them have been built (though I think they could be). Salvatore Pais has a lot to prove, and a patent is not proof of anything. It's not even evidence. At best, it is a property claim and/or an argument.
Perhaps, but he has the pocketbook of the US Space Force behind him, do you? Having that kind of funding would certainly make R&D that much easier.
It would only give you funding. It wouldn't make R&D easier (look at the history of the controlled fusion program). And even if the principle had been demonstrated by prototype examples, the idea can be quashed for other reasons (e.g., the Orion pulse propulsion concept).
I was once working with a team that was getting ready to build megawatt-class carbon monoxide electric discharge lasers (COEDLs) for weapon systems. We were in competition with Northrop. But that whole technology was bypassed when the Air Force decided to develop the chemical oxygen-iodine laser (COIL). So, you never know what the fate of an idea will be.
There is a mental process on this page that tends to go in the direction of: "It's conceivable" => "it's possible" => "it's probable" => "it's in development" => "it's a secret weapon!" When the real answer is: bumpkis. Be skeptical of super technology being touted. The stuff that is talked about is unlikely. The stuff that is likely is not talked about.
No offense, but if you don't think there were SCI programs way above you that had access to tech you could only dream of, then you are naive.
You're also a larper and forum slider with no patents on that, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Well, I'm not a larper. You can also call me a zebra, and it would also be not true.
And I'm not a forum slider---unless someone is masquerading as me. Have you seen me elsewhere? I would be curious to know.
Your dad was in Nagasaki so you know all about nuclear, you worked for Boeing for over 40 years, the media doesn't lie much at all, and we can trust 99% of science and history.
We've discovered all the above "facts" about you because you used them to establish credibility on why you are right and anons are wrong. This is what larpers do.
And Q confirmed Epstein was the first arrest, so of course you post nonsense like this in an attempt to derail actual news-
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTtuDLSZ/and-ladies-and-gentlemen-the-fir/
Your patents aren't co-signed by the secretary of the navy
No, but they were put forward by the Boeing Company and vetted by their patent staff. It may occur to you that a company like Boeing does not bother with pursuit of patents if they think they have no potential business value.
The patents could be signed by anyone. It wouldn't change the facts of what I said.
There’s some really interesting information on how a general(?) stepped into the patent process to verify to the patent office that, yes, is fact, this patent was fully functional. I don’t have a link for that at the moment, but could possibly find it this afternoon and report back.
Unfortunately, we live in times where creatures like Rachel Levine are accepted as women and allowed to wear a uniform, so the say-so of a ranking officer might be of interest, but only because of throwing rank around.
My skepticism is also based in the fact that a patent is a public disclosure. If so, where is the scientific evidence? No reason to keep public information secret.
Rachel Levine,,, oh hell I haven’t thought about that freak show in awhile..
I pretty much think she was purposely put there as part of the show. Im thinking that freak was told she will be taking that position by white hats and she better keep that worn out mouth shut or she’ll find herself in Club Gitmo for the rest of “her(?)” weird life.