Don't you dare compare me to that Luciferian piece of filth.
Refreshing to hear from a (supposed) military asset.
Most truth seekers have come across Wilcocks work- I've personally studied his offerings since he hit the scene in late 90's and bailed several yrs ago when he (and his handlers) were exposed as Luciferians. He just never quite passed the smell test, especially him claiming to be Edgar Cayce reincarnated kek.
David is good at what he does tho... don't know if he's sincerely mislead, an MK victim, or simply a dark soul
I don't see David Wilcock as Luciferian--at least not intentionally. He separated from Gaia TV because he said they were spinning his appearances on Ancient Aliens to support a Luciferian perspective on history. He also purports to be a Christian (as do many who aren't, I know, but it's at least worth noting that he regularly makes reference to his Christian beliefs). What I always go back to when I'm assessing David Wilcock is his book "The Source Field Investigations." This is good, solid work. I think what throws people off about David Wilcock is that I believe he's a genuine "autist" as in he is Asperger's, i.e., on the autistic spectrum. That makes him awkward socially, but it's likely also the root of his focus.
"NowTheyAllLose" calls him a "piece of filth". Having read all but one of David's books and seen many, many of his presentations, I don't see that. David puts a lot of emphasis on The Law of One books as a philosophy and as truth. I have read the first book and a half of those and can't get past that point. They set off my spidey sense. I wouldn't go so far as to call them Luciferian, as I'm not qualified to make that assessment since I've not read all of them. But if I did get through them and came to that conclusion, it would not surprise me. I think Satan's capabilities for deception know no bounds.
So, I could be wrong, of course, because once upon a time I thought Tom Hanks was the greatest, but I don't think David Wilcock is a "piece of filth." Supporting a Luciferian viewpoint without realizing it maybe, but I think that's been true at varying levels for many people before the Great Awakening got under way. I mean, as an example, how many of us loved Tom Hanks and voted for a Bush or a Clinton or some other POS satanist?
Don't you dare compare me to that Luciferian piece of filth.
Funny comment though.
Re: Wilcock
Don't you dare compare me to that Luciferian piece of filth.
Refreshing to hear from a (supposed) military asset.
Most truth seekers have come across Wilcocks work- I've personally studied his offerings since he hit the scene in late 90's and bailed several yrs ago when he (and his handlers) were exposed as Luciferians. He just never quite passed the smell test, especially him claiming to be Edgar Cayce reincarnated kek.
David is good at what he does tho... don't know if he's sincerely mislead, an MK victim, or simply a dark soul
I don't see David Wilcock as Luciferian--at least not intentionally. He separated from Gaia TV because he said they were spinning his appearances on Ancient Aliens to support a Luciferian perspective on history. He also purports to be a Christian (as do many who aren't, I know, but it's at least worth noting that he regularly makes reference to his Christian beliefs). What I always go back to when I'm assessing David Wilcock is his book "The Source Field Investigations." This is good, solid work. I think what throws people off about David Wilcock is that I believe he's a genuine "autist" as in he is Asperger's, i.e., on the autistic spectrum. That makes him awkward socially, but it's likely also the root of his focus.
"NowTheyAllLose" calls him a "piece of filth". Having read all but one of David's books and seen many, many of his presentations, I don't see that. David puts a lot of emphasis on The Law of One books as a philosophy and as truth. I have read the first book and a half of those and can't get past that point. They set off my spidey sense. I wouldn't go so far as to call them Luciferian, as I'm not qualified to make that assessment since I've not read all of them. But if I did get through them and came to that conclusion, it would not surprise me. I think Satan's capabilities for deception know no bounds.
So, I could be wrong, of course, because once upon a time I thought Tom Hanks was the greatest, but I don't think David Wilcock is a "piece of filth." Supporting a Luciferian viewpoint without realizing it maybe, but I think that's been true at varying levels for many people before the Great Awakening got under way. I mean, as an example, how many of us loved Tom Hanks and voted for a Bush or a Clinton or some other POS satanist?
Take it from a guy who's been through a Luciferian cult. He is.