As Clif High says these are the "name-stealers" from which the Europeans and Chinese once called them during the time of Khazaria. When it is to their advantage, they pretend to be white, speak in the name of being white, and commit acts of fraud and slander in the name of being white. It's common knowledge amongst themselves they don't consider themselves as being white, but genetically different and superior. But, how dare you for recognizing it.
The truth is they are neither Semitic or Israelites. Ashkenazi comes from Ashkenaz. Ashkenaz was a descendant of Noah. He was the first son of Gomer and brother of Riphath and Togarmah (Genesis 10:3, 1 Chronicles 1:6), with Gomer being the grandson of Noah through Japheth. According to the Encyclopaedia Biblica, Ashkenaz must have been one of the migratory peoples which in the time of Esar-haddon, burst upon the northern provinces of Asia Minor, and upon Armenia. This is the the kingdom of Ashkenaz and was first associated with the Scythian region, then later with the Slavic territories This is the region Khazaria later existed.
In 66 CE, when the Roman general Vespasian swept into Jerusalem, Judaism was a cultic, oral religion, with Herod's massive temple as its lodestar. Everything happened in the temple complex. Four years later, Vespasian's son Titus razed it to the ground. A quote from the Talmud: "Where was God under the rubble?" wondered the Rabbis. "How to praise him now that the temple was gone?" The sages agreed: Jews would have to become a people of the book, or they would disappear. Hence, they were not a people of the book before this time. This is when Judaism began and is a newer religion than Christianity is. Judaism was created to confront the spread of Christianity - using the Bible as a prop and also to conceal Judaism's ritualistic practice of blood-letting. From their own academic texts we find:
"Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew'". -- 1980 Jewish Almanac, 1st chapter "Identity Crisis". (Jewish Encyclopedia IV, 1902, p 335).
“The Edomites were conquered by John Hyrcanus who forcibly converted them to Judaism, and from then on they constituted a part of the Jewish people, Herod being one of their descendants”, The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1966), pg. 594, AS WELL AS in the The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977) p. 589.
The Greeks who conquered the region called it Idumea, meaning land of the Edomites and it was commonly called Idumea into the Roman times.
"Jews began in the 19th century to call themselves Hebrews and Israelites in 1860". – Encyclopedia Judaica 1971 Vol 10:23.
Concerning modern Jews, Professor A.N. Poliak, Tel Aviv University wrote:
"... this would mean that their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga; not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once believed to be the cradle of the Aryan race; and that genetically they are more related to the Hun, Uigur, and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob…," Prof. A. N. Poliak, Tel Aviv University
This is indisputably backed up by the archaeological finds of ancient Israelites and their remains. Cranial shape and size does not change racially. The Israelite skulls were dolichocephalic (long-headed) with avg. cranial capacity of 1416cc. This is identical to modern northern Europeans. Modern day Jews are brachycephalic (round-headed) with a much smaller avg. cranial capacity of 1266cc. This fact alone convincingly proves modern Jews are not descendants of ancient Israel.
I believe Canaanites derive their lineage from Cane. Nimrod was the Grandson of Noah & was the Masons fire “Great Builder”. The body of Gilgamesh (Nimrod) was discovered in Iraq in 2003:
The Cannanites, Hitities, Moabites & Israelites are all semetic. 3 out of 4 are child sacrificers to Ba’al; see the “antisemetic” smoke screen they set up for themselves? I believe the Rothchilds are literally Canaanites who worship Moloch & the Judeo Masonic agents have infiltrated all three Abrahamic religions:
Canaan was the son of Ham, who in turn was the son of Noah. According to Genesis 9:20–27, Noah became drunk and afterward cursed Canaan.
24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
25 And he said, Cursed [be] Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.
26 And he said, Blessed [be] the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
Canaan was the ancestor of the tribes who originally occupied the ancient Land of Canaan, referred to as the Levant. It was all the territory roughly the areas of modern-day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, western Jordan, and western Syria. Isn't it ironic that the "Greater Israel" goal includes all these lands between the Nile and Euphrates rivers? Isn't it ironic that the current demarcation line in the war in Syria is the Euphrates river? Isn't it ironic the two stripes on the Israeli flag represent these rivers? What does the six-pointed star really mean? Sidon is the Phoenician city in present day Lebanon. What is the chance that Canaan's first-born son's name was Sidon? Was this city named after Canaan's son? His second son was Heth. Canaan's descendants include the Hittites (children of Heth), from whom Esau took marriage to two Hittite women. This arrangement grieved his parents so much that their father rejected Esau's union to Canaanites. Esau gave up his birthright to receive the blessing of God's covenant with Abraham. He chose the temporary pleasures of this world over the lasting treasures of God's blessing.
As Clif High says these are the "name-stealers" from which the Europeans and Chinese once called them during the time of Khazaria. When it is to their advantage, they pretend to be white, speak in the name of being white, and commit acts of fraud and slander in the name of being white. It's common knowledge amongst themselves they don't consider themselves as being white, but genetically different and superior. But, how dare you for recognizing it.
Canaanite Moloch worshippers to be even MORE precise. They are Semitic, just not Israelite.
The truth is they are neither Semitic or Israelites. Ashkenazi comes from Ashkenaz. Ashkenaz was a descendant of Noah. He was the first son of Gomer and brother of Riphath and Togarmah (Genesis 10:3, 1 Chronicles 1:6), with Gomer being the grandson of Noah through Japheth. According to the Encyclopaedia Biblica, Ashkenaz must have been one of the migratory peoples which in the time of Esar-haddon, burst upon the northern provinces of Asia Minor, and upon Armenia. This is the the kingdom of Ashkenaz and was first associated with the Scythian region, then later with the Slavic territories This is the region Khazaria later existed.
In 66 CE, when the Roman general Vespasian swept into Jerusalem, Judaism was a cultic, oral religion, with Herod's massive temple as its lodestar. Everything happened in the temple complex. Four years later, Vespasian's son Titus razed it to the ground. A quote from the Talmud: "Where was God under the rubble?" wondered the Rabbis. "How to praise him now that the temple was gone?" The sages agreed: Jews would have to become a people of the book, or they would disappear. Hence, they were not a people of the book before this time. This is when Judaism began and is a newer religion than Christianity is. Judaism was created to confront the spread of Christianity - using the Bible as a prop and also to conceal Judaism's ritualistic practice of blood-letting. From their own academic texts we find:
"Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew'". -- 1980 Jewish Almanac, 1st chapter "Identity Crisis". (Jewish Encyclopedia IV, 1902, p 335).
“The Edomites were conquered by John Hyrcanus who forcibly converted them to Judaism, and from then on they constituted a part of the Jewish people, Herod being one of their descendants”, The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1966), pg. 594, AS WELL AS in the The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977) p. 589.
The Greeks who conquered the region called it Idumea, meaning land of the Edomites and it was commonly called Idumea into the Roman times.
"Jews began in the 19th century to call themselves Hebrews and Israelites in 1860". – Encyclopedia Judaica 1971 Vol 10:23.
Concerning modern Jews, Professor A.N. Poliak, Tel Aviv University wrote: "... this would mean that their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga; not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once believed to be the cradle of the Aryan race; and that genetically they are more related to the Hun, Uigur, and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob…," Prof. A. N. Poliak, Tel Aviv University
This is indisputably backed up by the archaeological finds of ancient Israelites and their remains. Cranial shape and size does not change racially. The Israelite skulls were dolichocephalic (long-headed) with avg. cranial capacity of 1416cc. This is identical to modern northern Europeans. Modern day Jews are brachycephalic (round-headed) with a much smaller avg. cranial capacity of 1266cc. This fact alone convincingly proves modern Jews are not descendants of ancient Israel.
I believe Canaanites derive their lineage from Cane. Nimrod was the Grandson of Noah & was the Masons fire “Great Builder”. The body of Gilgamesh (Nimrod) was discovered in Iraq in 2003:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2982891.stm
The Cannanites, Hitities, Moabites & Israelites are all semetic. 3 out of 4 are child sacrificers to Ba’al; see the “antisemetic” smoke screen they set up for themselves? I believe the Rothchilds are literally Canaanites who worship Moloch & the Judeo Masonic agents have infiltrated all three Abrahamic religions:
https://www.nytimes.com/1955/10/25/archives/canaanite-shrine-is-found-in-israel-rothschild-expedition-digs-up.html
Canaan was the son of Ham, who in turn was the son of Noah. According to Genesis 9:20–27, Noah became drunk and afterward cursed Canaan.
24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25 And he said, Cursed [be] Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. 26 And he said, Blessed [be] the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. 27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
Canaan was the ancestor of the tribes who originally occupied the ancient Land of Canaan, referred to as the Levant. It was all the territory roughly the areas of modern-day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, western Jordan, and western Syria. Isn't it ironic that the "Greater Israel" goal includes all these lands between the Nile and Euphrates rivers? Isn't it ironic that the current demarcation line in the war in Syria is the Euphrates river? Isn't it ironic the two stripes on the Israeli flag represent these rivers? What does the six-pointed star really mean? Sidon is the Phoenician city in present day Lebanon. What is the chance that Canaan's first-born son's name was Sidon? Was this city named after Canaan's son? His second son was Heth. Canaan's descendants include the Hittites (children of Heth), from whom Esau took marriage to two Hittite women. This arrangement grieved his parents so much that their father rejected Esau's union to Canaanites. Esau gave up his birthright to receive the blessing of God's covenant with Abraham. He chose the temporary pleasures of this world over the lasting treasures of God's blessing.