It's the judges and the juries and the relative weakness and lack of "focus" in the prosecutions.
And why would anyone higher than Danchenko have anything to fear from Durham at this point?
If you get tried by a suborned judge in a trial that is heard by a suborned jury - why would you consider it more than an inconvenience? People like Strzok, Page, Comey, McCabe et al expect to be tried. It's part of the package.
I hope that Durham is sandbagging a devastatingly effective RICO trial that will bring down the whole corrupt temple - but I don't see it.
If and when the military comes in I don't think they are going to be waiting on "referrals" from John Durham.
It's the judges and the juries and the relative weakness and lack of "focus" in the prosecutions.
And why would anyone higher than Danchenko have anything to fear from Durham at this point?
If you get tried by a suborned judge in a trial that is heard by a suborned jury - why would you consider it more than an inconvenience? People like Strzok, Page, Comey, McCabe et al expect to be tried. It's part of the package.
I hope that Durham is sandbagging a devastatingly effective RICO trial that will bring down the whole corrupt temple - but I don't see it.
If and when the military comes in I don't think they are going to be waiting on "referrals" from John Durham.