Part I / start at 16:33
https://frankspeech.com/video/mike-lindell-speaks-19th-annual-ozarks-worldview-weekend
Lindell: And, another thing that happened was the Dennis Montgomery evidence, by the way, ah, I'll backtrack. That might be a good, ah, gateway to the, a better transition to that. As you probably all know, the evidence I got on January 9th, 2021, right after the 7th and 8th after January 6th, when they tried to silence us forever. When 1.2 million Americans lost their platforms including our great president Donald Trump. That's when they tried to turn out the lights forever on our country. It would have been lights out. Everybody was either in fear or they or they lost their platforms. So I get a call by Brannon...
Howse: You don't have to mention me.
Lindell: I put stuff in my phone, you know, I put stuff in my phone to like, to remind me, you know, something something, you know, lake or whatever, to remind me that that has something to with the lake that I was at, you know. So, this says, Brannon Howse, I go, "Well, I better answer it. It has something to with my house," Right. So that's why I answered the phone, I going, "OK. Who is this?" He goes, well, I was at his show once before, and he says, "You need to talk to this gal and her name was Mary Fanning.
And she went on a 15 minute, she had me at hello, but it explained something to me that to this day no one can ever ever take from me and can never take from you and its... in the 2020 election non-residents voted in every state and in every county in the United States. But they didn't do it. 5000 or 20,000, in Missouri its even worse, let's say 22,000 people didn't come marching in to Missouri to vote here. That was done by computers. We all know this now. It wasn't done... people are good people at heart. I didn't, I couldn't just, wrap my head around, you know, "I'm going to go commit a felony. Who's with me!" "OK. Let's go vote. Let's pick a state and jump over and then vote in out own state." I mean, its just, you know, nuts. Right."
Howse: Right.
Lindell: So, Brannon gives me this and that it will explain this Dennis Montgomery had all the evidence. And I validated it for nine months... I'm going to fly through this... and we get to the Cyber Symposium. On the second night of the Cyber Symposium, as you all know, I was physically attacked. And then I was told by our team not to put the data out. There was a couple of reasons for that. One is that when I went to give that to the President on January 15th there was a government gag order on it and I needed him to sign that to release that out to the world. "We're going to save the world in the nick of time. God's giving us his grace. And we have this, you know, just sign here, and here's all the evidence." It was like, it was perfect, you know, I thought, I was handed this and that it was just a miracle.
And, ah, God did give us grace. I'll tell you all about that in a minute but, with that evidence there, with the Dennis Montgomery..., the lawyers shooed me around through the White House and then you all know the famous Martial Law picture that's still floating around out there. But, if that picture hadn't been taken we wouldn't be sitting her talking. Those were papers lawyers gave me to give, if I happened to be able to get in to give them to him, they were still sealed in the envelope. I've never read them to this day. But they gave them back to me when they shooed me down stairs and I'm outside the West Wing of the White House on a phone call with my son. And I look over the hill and the media is running like buffalo over the hill. I go, "I got to go, Derren, this is crazy." And they all got down right to the White House and they stop like sheep. And I go, I didn't know that they had read this, that they had took that famous picture. I go, "Would you all like for me to answer questions?" And they all go, "Yeah! Yeah!" And I go, "I changed my mind. You all find something nice to say about me." And then I walked back in the White House. And boy did he howl for my... and its never let up for a year and a half.
But that order never got signed that day. Well, I do have news. After, it was last summer when Dennis Montgomery went to Nevada to try and get that gag order signed, or, get it released by the government so we could take all that and say, "Hey! Take this" Especially you know, when I got all these billions of dollars worth of lawsuits. I sit and pump money into these machine companies that this is their big game. And you've got, I mean like ES&S right up in Omaha, Nebraska. They're waiting for the other two, Smartmatic and Dominion to run out the clock. Then they can come in and say, "Well, ours weren't as vulnerable as theirs were.
Howse: Even though we have them on video, do we not? From Louisiana?
Lindell: Yeah. In Louisiana they said, they said, theirs are vulnerable. They said all them are.
But, what we did, I'll just, real quick, give you this news. We went, uh, we had The Moment of Truth Summit about a month ago, now...
Howse: Uh, huh. In the middle of August. And right on stage, I told my... in June, I got into a big argument with my cyber guys, we had a big appreciation night, all these cyber guys and lawyers. And the next morning I get into an argument with five of them and one of then says, "Mike, You got to quit telling people about this Dennis Montgomery data. Its not real. For them its like a unicorn or something, an outer space ship or something, you know. Its like a legend or a mythical thing, right. And I'm going, "What are you talking about. This is real. He's the smartest man I've ever met. His stuff is under a government gag order,
Howse: Just so the audience that does not know, he developed software for the intelligence arena and the stuff that he had written and the stuff that he discovered and the stuff he was concerned about was so explosive they just put him under a gag order.
Lindell: Yeah. Its just everything. Its the most bizarre technology you'll ever see in this world. Ever. It was supposed to help, to take other person's, or steal other elections in other countries. That's what the government wants to cover up.
Howse: Its like a color revolution where the intelligence community can use their ability to flip and to put into power who they believe they want whether its more friendly to our country, or whether communists, or our government, have gotten control and want to put their communists buddies in power so that they practiced that and it went really well and then all of a sudden you heard all of us, in the summer of 2020, talking and doing show after show after show about a color revolution, a color revolution, and we're talking about that, right. That's when you have to worry about your intelligence arena stealing an election under the... covered, doing it under cover, and that's what this software, which they could use overseas, they could bring it and direct it over America and start stealing elections here.
Lindell: Yeah, that's right. I mean as far as I know its almost 50 countries or right around there. Alan can fact check me, it might be 50 or 52 that have already lost their countries to the machines starting with Venezuela. They never, you're never going to get your county back if the machines got people selected not elected.
Howse: And you're worried about that with your friend, and we can talk about that some more in a minute, but you're worried about that with your friend Bolsonaro in Brazil.
Lindell: Yeah. You guys need to pray for him. His run off is on October 30th, just in a couple of weeks. I talked to him the other day and they're... we have to pray they overrun the algorithms, but...
I want to tell you the good news here, so, any way, we put up on the stage at The Moment of Truth Summit, after I talked to the cyber guys they all said, back in June, "Mike. We have something called Cast Vote Records now that show the your numbers with Montgomery are even lower, he might have won New York state." And I'm going, "You know what, it doesn't matter if all the cameras, we've got different camera angles, right for the same crime." And so I'm off, like they said about Idaho when I said, the number I gave in this county in Idaho, there's 556 in that county or precinct, whatever it was. So, Idaho digs in there and they go... I said, you know, that Dennis' stuff said there were 42 that were flipped. And they said, "What do you mean. There's only 11." I said, "OK. So you're off by 11 out of 556 and you guys think that that's OK?" They sent me a bill for $6,000, the Secretary of State of Idaho wanted me to pay that. I go, "OK. I'll... here's a check."
So, I told these guys, I said, "One of you... ," you see they were all kind of looking at me like, about (coo-coo whistle) Dennis, you know, so, I said, "One of you needs to come down," and I said, "to validate his stuff. So some of you in the room might know Jeff O'Donnel. Well, Jeff went down there and he met Dennis, and he told his wife, he said, "You know what? This is going to be bad. I'm going to have to be the one to tell Mike that every thing he's done, he's been duped." That's what the media says, that I've been duped. Right. Well, I think I know enough about math, I took Calculus in 8th grade. That's one thing I'm pretty good at. You can't dupe numbers. You can't lie about numbers. We... numbers are numbers are numbers. you know. So, he goes down, he meets Dennis, he looks at his stuff. He calls me the next day and he goes,"Its the most bizarre stuff that I have ever seen. I've seen a unicorn." He said,...
Howse: He validated it.
Lindell: He validated it. He did. I'd already had it validated by other guys. But his other people in my group do not believe him even thought he's seen it. So he was so skeptical, that's how explosive it is when you think about it. How the technology is bizarre...
Howse: Powerful. More powerful than anything that you have ever seen.
(to be continued in thread)
"I'm not sure if my question was answered. It however doesn't sound like a DoJ Memorandum is the place a gag order due to the State's secrecy act can be lifted."
You are correct both technically and substantively. The DOJ memorandum only provides the judge (in this instance) with an informed opinion that a judge (since this is not the judge that promulgated the order in the first place) could use in making a decision (which has not been made to date) to lift or maintain the protective order currently in place.
The real back story here is not clear and is not clear on purpose. This rabbit hole
https://dennismontgomery.com/
lets you know what Dennis Montgomery knows is the real reason the gag order is still in effect. Scroll down and read the section that is titled Whistleblower Efforts, and after reading that section consider the following additional information.
The original protective order was issued based on the declaration to the judge in the 2007 court case (Montgomery v eTreppid Technologies) based on the declaration of then Director of National Intelligence John L. Negroponte, which you can read (and I recommend you read because there is simply no better way to comprehend what is really going on until you can parse the real from the spin on this issue) in the document linked below, beginning on page 96.
This is Dennis Montgomery's Declaration, attached to Mike Lindell's motion to intervene in the Montgomery v. eTreppid case in order to have the protective order lifted.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1216.2_2.pdf ( go to page 96 for DNI declaration)
However, there was a second presentation of secret information to the original judge in the case in 2007, the presentation was in camera (shown to the judge only by representatives of the US government) during which the judge was briefed and shown documentation not on the record nor to which either attorneys or plaintiff and defendant were shown. Now the judge is being asked to take the DoJs word 15 years later, without benefit of knowing now what the judge in 2007 knew, particularly since there is no record of the actual second secret presentation of the information provided the 2007 judge (maybe the documents could be produced again - but not record of the actual presentation, and that is problematic for the current judge).
Your next question...
"So, how can the Montgomery gag order be lifted by the DoJ?"
Gets to the spin Mike Lindell is putting on the DoJ memorandum.
Riddle me this, Batman. If the DoJ could lift the gag order, why would they have had to go a judge in the first place to have a gag order imposed?
What should be becoming clear is that nothing about this gag order business is what it appears to be.
Lots of smoke and lots of mirrors.
The original case that all of this came out of was based on the unsuccessful attempt by Montgomery's then business partner, a guy named Trepp (hence eTreppid - a play on the word intrepid) to gain control of all of Montgomery's proprietary software when Montgomery first balked when he found out what the government was really doing with his collection, exploitation and analysis software and systems.
When Trepp, afraid Montgomery was going to break his (Trepp's) rice-bowl of government contracts, and that he (Trepp) could not buy out Montgomery, he (Trepp) brought a lawsuit to try and force the issue and get the technology through the courts. Montgomery counter-sued, the Trepp v Montgomery case was joined with the Montgomery v eTreppid counter-suit, and that's why we are referring back to Montgomery v eTreppid and not eTreppid v Montgomery.
Now there are lots of slimy corrupt strings Trepp pulled in and out of court to put pressure on Montgomery, but one of the worst was being able to get Nevada state and local officials to use the FBI to front a raid on Montgomery's home in order to try and find and seize the really core and most valuable of the source code for various software applications.
Montgomery was able to prove that the FBI raid was based on lies and misrepresentations about who owned what by the original contracts of incorporation. Montgomery gave as good as he got and leaked a lot of "receipts" to the press in Nevada to push back on the outside political pressure that was coming to bear. The last guy you want to try and jack-up is the one-eyed guy who writes the source code for all the braille enabled computers in the land of the blind. Montgomery was able to get the judge to order the [FBI] to return everything they had taken in the illegal raid (they never got the important stuff in the first place) but they still have not returned everything seized in 2007 to this day.
Sound familiar?
Is this movie playing at your local theater?
Its called "Mar-a-Lago".
However, the protective order issued in connection with the 2007 case was never lifted (bad lawyering) and in 2010, the government showed up at a Montgomery bankruptcy proceeding (don't ask - but this is all smoke and mirrors too, having to do with how the 2007 case was settled and how Montgomery was protecting assets from ambulance-chasing vulture-identifying thug lawyers) and invoked the protective order stating Montgomery was still barred from revealing issues covered under the 2007 order.
There were some immunity negotiations in 2014 that is the next chapter / scene of this saga, in which Montgomery was allowed to give testimony as a whistleblower to Senate Intelligence Committee staff in exchange for finally turning over copies of the source code to the [FBI] that they had been after all along (insert here the backstory subplot of who, originally working through Trepp back in 2007, besides the [FBI], was working with Trepp to get all the good source code - told by a chain smoking nondescript heavily-wrinkled man of medium height and build and of no certain age in a faded grey suit). Somewhat beyond the scope of your question but it is a crucial part of the narrative as you will read later.
In June (I believe it was June) of 2021 Montgomery approached a court in Virginia where he had filed suit in 2017 against about anybody who was anybody in the Intelligence Community over alleged illegal spying on American citizens and government officials on a mass scale. See link below just to read the list of names of the defendants in that case...
https://regmedia.co.uk/2017/06/08/01-main.pdf
The 2021 Montgomery approach to the court over lifting the protective order (in connection with the 2017 lawsuit Montgomery v The Intelligence Community of the US of America - link just above) appears to have been tossed back to the District Court in Nevada, since that is the court of origination of the protective order. We have already discussed the current status of the protective order in the Nevada Court in regard to the motion and the DOJ memorandum.
However, before going back to the District Court in Nevada when there was no movement in the Virgina lawsuit (link just above), Mike Lindell purchased 80% interest in all things Dennis Montgomery and his technology and so now Lindell is the intervening petitioner in the 2007 Nevada case to have the Montgomery protective order lifted so that he (Lindell) can use the 32 terabytes of PCAP collection proving foreign manipulation (vote flipping) of the 2020 election in the lawsuit filed against him by Dominion for defamation. Strategy for that move is that now the case has much more national attention than if just Montgomery had approached the District Court in Nevada and so guys like me with no girlfriend can spend Friday nights reading old court cases.
So you see, it is not just about getting the protective order lifted so that Mike Lindell can use the PCAP collection data to defend himself in the defamation case against him by Dominion (see link below) ...
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59670901/us-dominion-inc-v-my-pillow-inc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
But so that Montgomery's case against the Intelligence Community in Virginia for mass spying on Americans can also go forward.
Here, watch this...
https://youtu.be/vJG698U2Mvo (1 min, 22 sec)
What everyone seems to be paying no attention to is the claim that in the PCAP data that Lindell wants to first "show the world" and then use in his court case is the presence of an electronic marker that Dennis Montgomery had inserted into the software source code he was forced to turn over to the [FBI] back in 2014 so that he would be allowed to provide behind-closed-doors testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee staff about the mass spying on Americans conducted by the US government and its intelligence agencies.
I'll write it again.
The PCAP data which proves foreign (a lot from China) manipulation of the 2020 election contains the electronic marker inserted into the source code of the software programs that Montgomery surrendered to the [FBI] in 2014.
"Lucy! You got some splainin to do!"
That is a bomb about to explode and the 900 lb gorilla dancing all around all these lawsuits and motions and protective orders, and Russia Russia Russia hoaxes...
The Washington Merry-Go-Round is going around and around and when it stops, it is going to stop right in front of that electronic marker brass ring in the PCAP data.
"Secondly, the President has this authority."
Even if the President has the authority, there is a process, and Lindell's lament about the Oval Office meeting and the lawyers and the reporter taking a picture of him outside the West Wing of the White House with 'The Memo' in his hand that had the words "Martial Law" in it, are just scripted scenes in the movie that is being filmed in real time right in front of our eyes every single day.
'The Memo' also had the name on it of Mike Lindell's future lead attorney, Kurt Olsen, a former Navy SEAL. What are the odds?
"Why didn't Trump remove it during his Administration?"
Personally, I think that screenplay script would have bombed in production. And if Trump had signed the Executive Order and lifted the protective order, where would we be in terms of waking as individuals and as a united nation to just how corrupt and rotten our government institutions, the legislative (national and state and local), the executive (national and state and local) and judiciary (national and state and local), really are?
Its a plan to reach across generations, races, genders, religions, cultures, etc. to unite we the people in one common cause: Freedom and liberty for all.
A lot of brainwashing, conditioning and gaslighting to undue. Can you think of a better way for things to have turned out?
And its a world wide plan, not just an American plan.
Thirdly, if there is a gag order on this, then how did Mike Lindell learn of the details?
https://youtu.be/lRTtLvKAKgk?t=100
"A lot of this is ambiguous at this point in time."
Hope the above adds some clarity and has addressed some of the ambiguity.
Hugely helpful. Thank you tremendously for your ongoing efforts.