If you answered “yes” to either of these questions, allow me to assist.
Durham’s role is much more significant than simply “prosecutor". His role is to brief the public on a broader conspiracy.
See my full analysis of the Danchenko verdict here!
https://bioclandestine.substack.com/p/alter-your-perspective-on-durhams
How can he be found guilty of lying to the feebs if the feebs were paying him to say what he said????
You can't, yet Durham brought charges and went to trial anyway.
Yes and why would he do that?
So the truths are brought out publically for future prosecutions is the only reason that makes sense.
Also, you don't need a Special Prosecutor to bring lying to the FBI charges. Obviously there's a lot more there. Using the Sussmann and Danchenko trials to bring forth evidence of overarching corruption within the FBI is the only thing that makes sense at this point. It'll be interesting to see what his next move is. I imagine bringing charges against higher up in the FBI is a difficult thing to do.
The point of this show trial is to reveal to Americans that our DOJ/FBI are completely corrupt and that the justice system is corrupt. If Devolution is real and if the Military are going to step in at some point, perhaps after the midterm elections are stolen, then this revelation will tamp down civil unrest. If Americans know the system is corrupt, they are going to support the Military arresting these people and holding tribunals.
Agree. Charging Danchenko would detract from the 'real' story which is the repeated corrupt acts of FBI leadership. Traitors deserve severe harsh penalties.
This was stickied yesterday.
The charges that Durham has brought to trial so far are not for convictions....but for info dumps.