YO! Haters! So, GAW rolling with the Danchenko trial verdict is "moving the goalposts," is it? Like Danchenko was our big end goal or something? That's your big 'gotcha' for us? That's *retarded*. LOOK INTO MY EYES:
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧠 These people are stupid!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (65)
sorted by:
He's releasing evidence into the public and showing how the court systems are corrupt and cannot be relied upon. There are other entities following these trials. Most other actions should be exhausted to help the public understand what is coming and why it has happened. No convictions in the regular court system with that much evidence proves there is no system left that can be salvaged. It has to be torn down to build a new uncorrupt system.
The only way has always been the military. There is no other way to solve this worldwide problem.
You're absolutely correct. I have no doubt Durham shined a spot light on the FBI. This is all very good. Your premise would also suggest the FBI, or members thereof, would be contenders for indictment. I hope you are right. Nevertheless, a conviction of Danchenko and Sussman would normally leave them in peril of spending time behind bars, and set the stage for everage in getting them to talk for leniency. This would allow revelations for opening more criminal cases.
Yet, we are not dealing with normal judges or a normal court within the beltway and because of this, sentencing got a conviction (vis. Danchenko, Sussman) could be as little as a slap on the wrists with some probation and a fine.
To be honest, I really don't know where this is heading. And no one else knows, except perhaps for Durham himself. And even with that, Durham's chess game hasn't even taken any of the Deep State's pawns yet. The strategy seems to be recognizable. He is positioning, but will Durham be able to make his move for a checkmate? From the beginning, we have been left with very little. It doesn't mean it's not happening though.