I might touch on this with different approaches, but for now I'm just gonna focus on what I see as the primary virtue of Q and the movement built around that operation.
First off, I see Q as a COIN Intel Operation.
https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/119629.pdf
https://media.greatawakening.win/post/3O3tExxylJR9.jpeg
In my opinion, that's the most important page Q ever linked to. Page 17 of the COIN handbook.
With that in mind, Q's primary function is to maintain the flow of information to the public.
I know we are disappointed with Durham, but even a lost case is accomplishing that goal. If Q didn't highlight Durham, we wouldn't be watching the case with eagle eyes. If he had to lose these lesser cases to establish a base of facts found by the juries before going for bigger fish, then this proceeding would have occurred either way.
Only now, because Q put a push pin and red string to Durham, we are hyper-sensitive to the most minute details of each case.
These cases aren't being recorded or livestreamed to the public, so there's an incredible amount of fine points that would absolutely have fallen through the cracks, just like any other corruption case in our rigged judicial system.
Which leads me to what I see as the most important virtue of Q:
Modular Thinking
Jigsaw Analogy
It's hard to find a singular definition that covers what I mean, so I'm gonna use an analogy.
When you put together a jigsaw puzzle, and are looking at all the pieces laid out, you are immediately confronted with having to devise a system by which you can put together the final product. There are obstacles which must be tackled before you even begin to snap the first pieces together.
Such obstacles include:
- Some pieces are upside down, with the blank cardboard facing side up.
- Some pieces are notably different, like edge and corner pieces.
- The final image is printed on the containing box, that is, if you have it still.
- Your table must be larger than the final dimensions of the jigsaw puzzle.
These are the most immediate criteria which must be addressed before solving the puzzle.
Next, once you are sure you have a properly sized table, that you have the final image to help reference, that you have sorted the edge and end pieces, and that each piece is print-side up -- that's when the real work begins.
Modular Thinking now comes into full play.
In order to solve the puzzle in the most expedient timeframe possible, you must first come up with a set of self-ascribed rules to follow so that the pieces are organized and categorized by their similarities and compatibility with one another.
For example, there are far fewer edge and corner pieces than any others, and it is a certainty that all these pieces will form the bounds of the puzzle, by design. It's the common sense aspect of the puzzle solving, and most rational people will be able to understand the virtue in creating a framework and working in towards the center.
I'm sure the most astute of you see some similarities with Q and this ideal, right? I'll get back to that.
Next, you look at the box and spot any color blotches which you can use to more easily sort the pieces. The sky is blue. Which means all the blue pieces are likely part of the sky. You can start snapping a few together and form small islands. Trees are green, so you sort all the green together and start building. Water is also blue, but I'll get to that.
These islands of combined pieces and the frame are the tell-tale sign of Modular Thinking. You're dividing the work load and sorting a most nebulous constellation of pieces into smaller yet more portable islands that can be slid into place.
The Virtue of Modular Thinking
What seemed like a pile colors vomited onto the table has been approached systematically and the puzzle solved using methodologies based on spotting trends and grouping things such that they are more easily tackled individually. Doing this ensures one segment of the puzzle doesn't clutter another segment and lead to a loss of time due to continually sorting and examining the same pieces over and over again.
This is what Q has taught us.
Each topic, whether it is the Clinton Crime Syndicate, Big Pharma, Election Theft, Barry Soetoro, Sex Trafficking, The Border, the Satanic Cabal, etc. are all Modules of thought and topics which when thought about all at once leads one to appear as an absolute lunatic -- and in many cases, that isn't an inaccurate assessment.
But, if you divide them all into Modules, and work on them separately, building upon them like islands in a jigsaw puzzle, then you can see how each works individually. As you work on them individually, they grow and eventually it is crystal clear how all of them work together to form the Big Picture.
Q is like the Frame -- the edges and corner pieces. Q posts aid to keep us focused within the box and maintain the full size of the puzzle so that we aren't left wondering on topics that are superfluous. Our given goal is to fill in the jigsaw puzzle. Knowing the dimensions of the Big Picture is instrumental to that goal.
In other words, Q provides an anchor by which we can establish assumptions rather than wild musings. By using Q posts as reference, we can get a good feel of when we have fallen off the beaten path.
Normies and those who don't accept Q as a valuable research tool are not unlike those who refuse to build the frame of edge and corner pieces when putting together a jigsaw puzzle. They can still arrive at the end goal, but isn't it the obviously harder route?
That's the virtue of Q and Q posts -- it provides free-thinkers, Anons, with a frame of reference and the tools to form Modules of thought surrounding various aspects of the corruption scheme. It further helps to weed out the frivolous conspiracies from the most relevant.
Once we have a good picture of each individual Module of corruption, then we can more easily piece them together to form the Big Picture.
There is another...
I'll close this analogy with one last comparison to what we see with Durham.
For that, I'll direct you to this post:
...
What did we learn this week?
-
Durham 'true' start?
-
Durham 'take-over' Huber [select parts re: CF-i]?
What if there's another prosecutor (outside of DC) assigned by SESSIONS w/ the same mandate/authority?
Q
...
Durham isn't the only one working on this case. There is another prosecutor working behind the scenes, taking what Durham finds as fact before the court and jury, and handing them up to a more cloistered investigation.
Taking this back to the jigsaw puzzle analogy, I imagine that Durham is like someone working on the sky while this other prosecution stint is working on the ocean or lake in the jigsaw image.
Both investigations are composed of blue pieces, and so it's easy to get them mixed up with one another.
What Durham is doing is separating the sky pieces from the water pieces and handing the water pieces off to the Deeper investigation. He's going in with a microscope and picking out the waves and seafoam from the clouds.
Us Anons see they are blue, but we aren't in a position to be able to pick them out from one another. As Durham separates the pieces, we get a clearer idea of what makes each piece part of one Module as compared to another, and so does the secondary prosecutor.
That's my take, anyways... Q has tutored us to think Modularly in order to solve the puzzle. Durham is currently acting as the primary piece sorter.
Very nicely put. Worthy of more attention.