“I don’t need to know why he said it how he said it”

Yet the why and how are important because he made an assertion without providing evidence. Assertions require evidence. 2000 Mules was good because it made an assertion (mules are trafficking fake ballots) and then provided evidence for it. If you want to blindly trust someone without proof, then that’s fine, but I’m sick and tired of people claiming to be part of our movement, making fantastical claims using cryptic language, then dropping the subject like a hot anvil when nothing comes of it. It demoralizes our movement and gives free ammo to doomers and blackpillers.