That’s like giving someone a gun, giving them a target, a time, and a place, and then afterwards claiming you’re not complicit in the murder.

Or the feds in the US approaching social media companies to censor users, and then claiming it wasn’t a violation of the first amendment because the actions were taken by a private company.

TD would not have dreamed to take those actions on their own. It was 100% an act of government. No amount of semantics will refute that.