Firstly, the government has no business regulating marriage.
I will accept that only if we're churches power to dole out punishment and carry out investigations, otherwise marriage becomes meaningless with no backing to ensure loyalty.
Civil Unions should also be easy to dissolved
I completely disagree as that spits in the face of what they're meant to be.
people should be allowed to form them for whatever reason. Even two straight people wanting to consolidate living arrangements and taxes under one roof should have those same benefits.
Actually in support of this because there are a lot of incels who would benefit from it, the only problem is they'd be seen as faggots.
Most people are not as in favor of the trans thing as the TV insists
Doesn't matter, they will tolerate whatever they're forced to.
I completely disagree as that spits in the face of what they're meant to be.
Civil unions are intentionally made to be synonymous with marriage. We should get away from this notion. Civil unions are not meant to be marriage. "In sickness and in health", "'til death do you part" and such are products of marriage.
I will accept that only if we're churches power to dole out punishment and carry out investigations, otherwise marriage becomes meaningless with no backing to ensure loyalty.
I completely disagree as that spits in the face of what they're meant to be.
Actually in support of this because there are a lot of incels who would benefit from it, the only problem is they'd be seen as faggots.
Doesn't matter, they will tolerate whatever they're forced to.
Civil unions are intentionally made to be synonymous with marriage. We should get away from this notion. Civil unions are not meant to be marriage. "In sickness and in health", "'til death do you part" and such are products of marriage.