Firstly, the government has no business regulating marriage. The "slippery slope" started with evangelical faggots agreeing to marriage license in the first place, a direct violation of the First Amendment. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". Marriage is traditionally an establishment of religion. The word in government marriage needs to be changed to "Civil Union". The idea is still good. Allowing access in hospitals and legal things for both people. Civil Unions should also be easy to dissolved and people should be allowed to form them for whatever reason. Even two straight people wanting to consolidate living arrangements and taxes under one roof should have those same benefits.
Now, whichever churches decide to participate in gay weddings that's their business, however forcing bakeries to make cakes is wrong and most of the sane homosexual community agreed. Where you won't get any arguments from me is when it comes to protecting children. What you do need to understand is this is where the "slippery slope" becomes mostly fiction. Most people are not as in favor of the trans thing as the TV insists. It's probably why most were relieved that they've been declared retarded- I mean disabled... And I've done my fair share of sexual indulgence and wankey spankey and I can tell you that I have not once felt attracted to penis or children... Surprise surprise degeneracy doesn't magically lead to more degeneracy as the slippery slope tries to get you to believe and also pedophilia isn't degenerate: it's rape. Children cannot consent to anything sexual and if it's not consensual, it's rape and yes degenerates know the difference. Oh and also worth noting: all humans are degenerate, yes even self righteous Suzie who's never seen a penis and saving herself for Jesus...
Anyway, long story short, this is a corporation trying to push this. It's always been corporations. A lot of rational and reasonable homos are becoming "right wing extremists" because of this shit. It was always an artificial slope. Humans are not as terrible as "satan" or the satan types need us to be. The worst of what we have done has always been artificial. We may be horny, selfish survivalists at our naturally worst, but the truly evil among us has always been less than 1%.
Firstly, the government has no business regulating marriage.
I will accept that only if we're churches power to dole out punishment and carry out investigations, otherwise marriage becomes meaningless with no backing to ensure loyalty.
Civil Unions should also be easy to dissolved
I completely disagree as that spits in the face of what they're meant to be.
people should be allowed to form them for whatever reason. Even two straight people wanting to consolidate living arrangements and taxes under one roof should have those same benefits.
Actually in support of this because there are a lot of incels who would benefit from it, the only problem is they'd be seen as faggots.
Most people are not as in favor of the trans thing as the TV insists
Doesn't matter, they will tolerate whatever they're forced to.
I completely disagree as that spits in the face of what they're meant to be.
Civil unions are intentionally made to be synonymous with marriage. We should get away from this notion. Civil unions are not meant to be marriage. "In sickness and in health", "'til death do you part" and such are products of marriage.
Firstly, the government has no business regulating marriage. The "slippery slope" started with evangelical faggots agreeing to marriage license in the first place, a direct violation of the First Amendment. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". Marriage is traditionally an establishment of religion. The word in government marriage needs to be changed to "Civil Union". The idea is still good. Allowing access in hospitals and legal things for both people. Civil Unions should also be easy to dissolved and people should be allowed to form them for whatever reason. Even two straight people wanting to consolidate living arrangements and taxes under one roof should have those same benefits.
Now, whichever churches decide to participate in gay weddings that's their business, however forcing bakeries to make cakes is wrong and most of the sane homosexual community agreed. Where you won't get any arguments from me is when it comes to protecting children. What you do need to understand is this is where the "slippery slope" becomes mostly fiction. Most people are not as in favor of the trans thing as the TV insists. It's probably why most were relieved that they've been declared retarded- I mean disabled... And I've done my fair share of sexual indulgence and wankey spankey and I can tell you that I have not once felt attracted to penis or children... Surprise surprise degeneracy doesn't magically lead to more degeneracy as the slippery slope tries to get you to believe and also pedophilia isn't degenerate: it's rape. Children cannot consent to anything sexual and if it's not consensual, it's rape and yes degenerates know the difference. Oh and also worth noting: all humans are degenerate, yes even self righteous Suzie who's never seen a penis and saving herself for Jesus...
Anyway, long story short, this is a corporation trying to push this. It's always been corporations. A lot of rational and reasonable homos are becoming "right wing extremists" because of this shit. It was always an artificial slope. Humans are not as terrible as "satan" or the satan types need us to be. The worst of what we have done has always been artificial. We may be horny, selfish survivalists at our naturally worst, but the truly evil among us has always been less than 1%.
Marriage has long been a contractual blending of 2 peoples. For eons we've had things like dowries and bride price.
I will accept that only if we're churches power to dole out punishment and carry out investigations, otherwise marriage becomes meaningless with no backing to ensure loyalty.
I completely disagree as that spits in the face of what they're meant to be.
Actually in support of this because there are a lot of incels who would benefit from it, the only problem is they'd be seen as faggots.
Doesn't matter, they will tolerate whatever they're forced to.
Civil unions are intentionally made to be synonymous with marriage. We should get away from this notion. Civil unions are not meant to be marriage. "In sickness and in health", "'til death do you part" and such are products of marriage.
Like clockwork with the pro homo bullshit.
Marriage has always been a Legal Civil Contract in every culture you can name. That's because property and money are involved when two people marry.
You can have all the religious ceremonies you want around your wedding, or you can just stand up in front of a judge in his office and get married.
But either way, it remains a Legal Civil Contract and as long as money and property are involved, it will stay that way.
Sure