They namely put language from previous decisions so that it cannot be misinterpreted. Thus declaring it an individual right. I think the strict scrutiny is meant to make it exceedingly difficult to even draft a bill that would infringe, like say a $1000 tax on all ammunition purchases.
Why isn't "Shall not be infringed" be enough?
They namely put language from previous decisions so that it cannot be misinterpreted. Thus declaring it an individual right. I think the strict scrutiny is meant to make it exceedingly difficult to even draft a bill that would infringe, like say a $1000 tax on all ammunition purchases.