PSA: ARE THE MODS COMPROMISED? Sadly, GAW gets no Twitter wine on tap. "My post isn't showing up!" We are a .WIN, so any weirdness comes from PW's servers. All mods can do is sticky/remove stuff. We have some extra advanced script toys our mod geniuses made, but we CANNOT ghost users or posts. THX!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🐸 WAG THE FROG 🐸
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
I hear you.
I agree.
But one needs to be very, very careful of your sources.
For example ALL of this is a scam based on 100% lies:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnitsky_Act
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/07/14/the-magnitsky-act-explained/ (paywall - just used as example)
https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-252B-11715
Here is what happened to Bill Browder in 2017. During that July 2017 senate hearing, Senator Lindsey Graham, as only a southerner can, called him a bald-faced liar to his face. From this point on I became convinced that patriots were in control.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/10/23/559463071/state-department-reportedly-revokes-visit-of-magnitsky-act-campaigner
FYI: In the senate the Magnitsky Act was sponsored by Sen. John McCain and Sen. Ben Cardin. That alone should have you rigging for red.
In the NPR article above, (its part of the gaslighting and propaganda techniques) the author drops the name of Natalia Veselnitskaya and the Trump Tower meeting with Don Jr.
Read this, for a summary of her offer to testify before congress and
https://www.newsweek.com/natalia-veselnitskaya-senate-judiciary-trump-jr-meeting-703176
Senator Grassley got answers on paper.
The Mueller Invesigation (Weissmann Investigation) did not take her up on her offer to give testimony.
Here is a youtube query, a lot current as the smear campaign began, and the spin is neck deep...
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=nataliya+veselnitskaya
So plenty of press (print and broadcast), on-line articles and government publications about Bill Browder's lies surrounding the genesis of (death of Sergei Magnitsky) and the passage of the Magnitsky act - he has published two books (one of which was a New York Times best seller).
Next to nothing is accessible in comparison with out not just digging, but wholesale excavation of the historical record, exposing the lies.
Links, more on this subject om Magnitsky Act and importance of using original source documents, if interested:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6JRrPNK/apropos-of-day-1-of-the-igor-dan/
(post text and comment thread both contain info and links back to original source documents, depositions, transcripts.)
https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6SrTmfZ/the-mueller-special-counsel-had-/c/
Open sources must be validated.
This is excellent information, I’ll definitely be putting effort into understanding what took place here.
Before I found Q and this site I was a news/information junkie. I would read everything from Jocobin/Nazi publications to The Federalist and Conservative Punk. For me it was a form of Research bc once identified a topic/happening that gave different competing facts I knew that was something I needed to look into. Most of the time it would be an obscure (at least appeared to be) subject matter that was being reported on and those tended to be some of the most consequential once I could see through the smoke and mirrors. They also are the most difficult to explain because they take a level of insight that usually only a news wonk would have.
So I get what your saying about Anons and research and maybe I’m under valuing the effort it took to see and understand what I was digging into. Maybe I feel the way I do bc for such an extraordinarily huge and terrible problem it surprises me that I, a guy living outside the beltway, without a polysci degree, could figure it out. The one thing I never understood when I was on my own was the “why”. When I found Q ALL CAME TOGETHER CRASHINGLY.