That depends on a variety of factors, but wouldn't you say that her strong emotions could speak to a level of fear about something like that happening to her? At the very least, if she isn't actually implicated in a crime, the digging that's to be done (which will center around Twitter's bans and censorship, algorithms used to potentially target individuals at the behest of the FBI or key politicians etc.) will center around all the job functions she was involved with. That might end up convicting her in the court of public opinion.
At the very least, she's already a hot potato in terms of her future career prospects - most executives at her level easily slip into a new and comparably lucrative position somewhere else, so maybe she was overwrought knowing it will be hard for her to find work in the private sector following the dustup that is coming.
All I'm saying is if (and that is a major one) we get enough firepower into Congress following these midterms, we may actually see that much talked about "Church style commission" open to investigate the FBI & DOJ. If that happens, Twitter is one of the main courses on the menu, and it's new owner seems like he would be more than happy to share any records they want to check into regarding the previous management team.
[Or maybe he's taking the company private to hand over full control to the government, but I don't think they'd be mulling over the idea of investigating one of their largest contractors if that were the case...]
That could be really bad for her. Its going to get interesting in a lot ways, that's all we can say for certain.
Dom, YOU bring up a VERY good point. IF the Gadde was in DIRECT contact with the FIB and there is/are records of the calls, initiation by either side is circumspect at least for now...then she is guilty of 1st Amendment Violation and can be tried by the FEDS...
NOW, the real question is: Will the FEDS try this awful woman???
What crime could she have committed that she could actually get prosecuted and convicted for?
That depends on a variety of factors, but wouldn't you say that her strong emotions could speak to a level of fear about something like that happening to her? At the very least, if she isn't actually implicated in a crime, the digging that's to be done (which will center around Twitter's bans and censorship, algorithms used to potentially target individuals at the behest of the FBI or key politicians etc.) will center around all the job functions she was involved with. That might end up convicting her in the court of public opinion.
At the very least, she's already a hot potato in terms of her future career prospects - most executives at her level easily slip into a new and comparably lucrative position somewhere else, so maybe she was overwrought knowing it will be hard for her to find work in the private sector following the dustup that is coming.
All I'm saying is if (and that is a major one) we get enough firepower into Congress following these midterms, we may actually see that much talked about "Church style commission" open to investigate the FBI & DOJ. If that happens, Twitter is one of the main courses on the menu, and it's new owner seems like he would be more than happy to share any records they want to check into regarding the previous management team.
[Or maybe he's taking the company private to hand over full control to the government, but I don't think they'd be mulling over the idea of investigating one of their largest contractors if that were the case...]
That could be really bad for her. Its going to get interesting in a lot ways, that's all we can say for certain.
Dom, YOU bring up a VERY good point. IF the Gadde was in DIRECT contact with the FIB and there is/are records of the calls, initiation by either side is circumspect at least for now...then she is guilty of 1st Amendment Violation and can be tried by the FEDS...
NOW, the real question is: Will the FEDS try this awful woman???
Fraud. They sold advertising to companies based on fraudulent numbers and removed/censored 3/4 of their potential customers.