You are a man, and you interpret it. Interpret means to derive understanding according to meaning. Your interpretation is incorrect because it is contrary to all ancillary documentation which shows clearly the meaning of the text you reference, so you have to either study up on the writings of the early Church so that your interpretation can make sense according to the understanding of those who wrote it and taught it, or make up your own ahistoric interpretation 1500 years later that is easily debunked by a quick study of relevant related texts and documented traditions.
Sorry man, but you don’t get to claim your understanding is not an interpretation. It is - and it’s bunk and lacks authority.
You are a man, and you interpret it. Interpret means to derive understanding according to meaning. Your interpretation is incorrect because it is contrary to all ancillary documentation which shows clearly the meaning of the text you reference, so you have to either study up on the writings of the early Church so that your interpretation can make sense according to the understanding of those who wrote it and taught it, or make up your own ahistoric interpretation 1500 years later that is easily debunked by a quick study of relevant related texts and documented traditions.
Sorry man, but you don’t get to claim your understanding is not an interpretation. It is - and it’s bunk and lacks authority.