Besides - Non-dogmatic (praxis) tradition has changed many times. Are women still compelled to weir hair coverings as Paul implores?
If you want to understand the Bible, you don’t look to interpretation that emerged 1500 years after the fact. That’s what democrats do with the Constitution. With the constitution, you look to the other documents of the founders and framers to understand intent.
In the same way, look to those who were there while the New Testament was still not yet compiled as one book. Justin Martyr, Ignatius of Antioch, Clement of Rome, Hyppolatus, etc
IF HE HAS A FAMILY.
Besides - Non-dogmatic (praxis) tradition has changed many times. Are women still compelled to weir hair coverings as Paul implores?
If you want to understand the Bible, you don’t look to interpretation that emerged 1500 years after the fact. That’s what democrats do with the Constitution. With the constitution, you look to the other documents of the founders and framers to understand intent.
In the same way, look to those who were there while the New Testament was still not yet compiled as one book. Justin Martyr, Ignatius of Antioch, Clement of Rome, Hyppolatus, etc
read 1 cor 7 with understanding
for those who have children the question is relevant. Many of the early bishops had no children.
According to your interpretation 2000 years later.
I don’t think so.