So, another year old stealth account made en mass, like so many others that adds nothing to the conversation that every reddit "top mind" that has come over here and used the same "logic".
That is not an argument! Also, not a redditer and I don't think of myself as very stealth. More inconsistent in active use.
I'm just saying it doesn't make sense to me, to announce your plans in a manner oblique enough for your adherents to keep making guesses and proclamations that turn out to be wrong, but specific enough to give your adversaries a leg up. If you can't even say it makes sense to you, nonetheless try to pull the wool from my eyes, and just throw lame ad hominems around... Well, it doesn't exactly dissuade me from thinking the most popular interpretations of Q are at best misguided.
I could absolutely see an argument that Q conducting business in this way is a matter of honor, like throwing a sword to an unarmed person who challenged you to a duel, or giving your prey a head start so you can have an honorable hunt. You can have that one for free. I just have yet to see a theory that articulates how this is a wise or effective strategy.
I apologize if I am late to the party and this is a line of questioning that has been thoroughly dismantled and answered months and months ago. If that is the case, as the self-proclaimed public face of Q, there should probably be an FAQ I could be linked to that answers this common question?
So, another year old stealth account made en mass, like so many others that adds nothing to the conversation that every reddit "top mind" that has come over here and used the same "logic".
That is not an argument! Also, not a redditer and I don't think of myself as very stealth. More inconsistent in active use.
I'm just saying it doesn't make sense to me, to announce your plans in a manner oblique enough for your adherents to keep making guesses and proclamations that turn out to be wrong, but specific enough to give your adversaries a leg up. If you can't even say it makes sense to you, nonetheless try to pull the wool from my eyes, and just throw lame ad hominems around... Well, it doesn't exactly dissuade me from thinking the most popular interpretations of Q are at best misguided.
I could absolutely see an argument that Q conducting business in this way is a matter of honor, like throwing a sword to an unarmed person who challenged you to a duel, or giving your prey a head start so you can have an honorable hunt. You can have that one for free. I just have yet to see a theory that articulates how this is a wise or effective strategy.
I apologize if I am late to the party and this is a line of questioning that has been thoroughly dismantled and answered months and months ago. If that is the case, as the self-proclaimed public face of Q, there should probably be an FAQ I could be linked to that answers this common question?
loads of q predictions came to pass. There's a whole thread on here detailing like 30 of them ffs. You're chatting shit
And this one won't. Not this year. Next year I will make the same prediction.