IDK.... Astronomy used to be one of my favorite hobbies. Then I realized they are lazy and reuse photos they have been pushing on us for decades. Don't believe me? Go to a public library and open up old astronomy books, then open up new ones. LAZY. Go to the Chicago Science and Industry Museum for space tech. That shit hasn't been updated since the mid 1980s; think Challenger incident. I'm not going to say I know, but I can say what I do not know. Btw, searching for hidden tech lead me to this larger community many years ago. The questions I had then are still unanswered.
They do it for safety. After a few bad images of earth were generated showing different % of ocean coverage that couldn't be explained, they limit inconsistencies by not generating new stuff unless there's a real need from a new storyline....
Try looking at a globe of the Earth from a distance of 3 inches, and then a distance of 12 feet, and reconcile the % of ocean coverage. The discrepancy comes from the fact that the closer you are to the Earth, the less of the globe you can see, so an ocean will look larger in proportion to what is seen. (Different satellite altitudes.) This is called geometry.
Holy cow. yeah, you USED to be "into" astronomy. This is unbelievably retarded. They're not re-using pictures. They're taking photos of the same stellar objects/areas that measure change very slowly.
These areas are changing, however. Look at how the Horse's Head Nebula has changed just since Hubble started. In 30 years, it might not even exist.
IDK.... Astronomy used to be one of my favorite hobbies. Then I realized they are lazy and reuse photos they have been pushing on us for decades. Don't believe me? Go to a public library and open up old astronomy books, then open up new ones. LAZY. Go to the Chicago Science and Industry Museum for space tech. That shit hasn't been updated since the mid 1980s; think Challenger incident. I'm not going to say I know, but I can say what I do not know. Btw, searching for hidden tech lead me to this larger community many years ago. The questions I had then are still unanswered.
They do it for safety. After a few bad images of earth were generated showing different % of ocean coverage that couldn't be explained, they limit inconsistencies by not generating new stuff unless there's a real need from a new storyline....
Try looking at a globe of the Earth from a distance of 3 inches, and then a distance of 12 feet, and reconcile the % of ocean coverage. The discrepancy comes from the fact that the closer you are to the Earth, the less of the globe you can see, so an ocean will look larger in proportion to what is seen. (Different satellite altitudes.) This is called geometry.
Holy cow. yeah, you USED to be "into" astronomy. This is unbelievably retarded. They're not re-using pictures. They're taking photos of the same stellar objects/areas that measure change very slowly.
These areas are changing, however. Look at how the Horse's Head Nebula has changed just since Hubble started. In 30 years, it might not even exist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pobxRfktJuw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwOoTfjqv34