I get the sentiment, but I don’t agree with the burn. Space is very much a Q topic. While we may not believe it, some people think the earth is flat…. Hell, supposedly the entire world believed this until not long ago. There are plenty of anomalies that factually exist that allow for a cogent argument against government released evidence of our space programs.
Nonsense. People understood the Earth to be round by 300 BC, and made some pretty accurate estimates of its diameter. It was firm enough to justify Columbus's voyage of discovery. The proof was conclusive with Magellan's circumnavigation 500 years ago. And doubly so with Gagarin's orbit in 1961. There are no anomalies, just ignorance about what is true.
Ummmm... the middle pyramid (Khafre) has the diameter of the Earth encoded into it, accurate down to 391 feet. People that actually take Egypt seriously (I just got back from living there for 9 months) believe that the pyramid is over 36,000 years old.
It would be 2300 years ago, which takes in essentially the great majority of history and knowledge. That is NOT "not long ago." You are aware that the accumulation of knowledge was a gradual process? But this was one of the earlier discoveries. All the more reason to accept it. Our knowledge on this point greatly precedes the existence of NASA, so you need to stop with the "NASA lies about space" nonsense. (I will agree they do lie about "climate," but that is based on catching them repeatedly in lies based on their own data. It is an example of political corruption of the scientific process.)
“They only lie about one thing and nothing else you nooooob”….. yea that sounds completely sane. Jesus just read my original comment. Some of y’all act like you have all the answers. I’ll bet you my life savings you don’t. Don’t discount a belief just because it’s not your own.
It's worse than that, Einstein conceded that there would be no earthly experiment that could prove the shape and motion of the earth because there is no difference between a moving planet around a sun or a moving sun around a stationary planet.
Primarily, the moving earth is preferred for merely philosophical reasons.
Give me the quotation, because he surely knew better. Cartography is enough to prove the shape of the Earth. And there is a difference between heliocentrism and geocentrism: we can determine the Earth moves by trigonometric measurements of the star positions (parallax). The Earth moves...because it does. We send probes to other planets by virtue of the heliocentric theory. It would be impossible with a geocentric theory. So, we use the moving Earth for purely practical reasons (it works and is true).
I get the sentiment, but I don’t agree with the burn. Space is very much a Q topic. While we may not believe it, some people think the earth is flat…. Hell, supposedly the entire world believed this until not long ago. There are plenty of anomalies that factually exist that allow for a cogent argument against government released evidence of our space programs.
Nonsense. People understood the Earth to be round by 300 BC, and made some pretty accurate estimates of its diameter. It was firm enough to justify Columbus's voyage of discovery. The proof was conclusive with Magellan's circumnavigation 500 years ago. And doubly so with Gagarin's orbit in 1961. There are no anomalies, just ignorance about what is true.
Yes……… 2000 years is not long ago mah dude. Not sure what you’re disagreeing with.
Ummmm... the middle pyramid (Khafre) has the diameter of the Earth encoded into it, accurate down to 391 feet. People that actually take Egypt seriously (I just got back from living there for 9 months) believe that the pyramid is over 36,000 years old.
The information encoded into the pyramids is insane.
It would be 2300 years ago, which takes in essentially the great majority of history and knowledge. That is NOT "not long ago." You are aware that the accumulation of knowledge was a gradual process? But this was one of the earlier discoveries. All the more reason to accept it. Our knowledge on this point greatly precedes the existence of NASA, so you need to stop with the "NASA lies about space" nonsense. (I will agree they do lie about "climate," but that is based on catching them repeatedly in lies based on their own data. It is an example of political corruption of the scientific process.)
“They only lie about one thing and nothing else you nooooob”….. yea that sounds completely sane. Jesus just read my original comment. Some of y’all act like you have all the answers. I’ll bet you my life savings you don’t. Don’t discount a belief just because it’s not your own.
It's worse than that, Einstein conceded that there would be no earthly experiment that could prove the shape and motion of the earth because there is no difference between a moving planet around a sun or a moving sun around a stationary planet.
Primarily, the moving earth is preferred for merely philosophical reasons.
Give me the quotation, because he surely knew better. Cartography is enough to prove the shape of the Earth. And there is a difference between heliocentrism and geocentrism: we can determine the Earth moves by trigonometric measurements of the star positions (parallax). The Earth moves...because it does. We send probes to other planets by virtue of the heliocentric theory. It would be impossible with a geocentric theory. So, we use the moving Earth for purely practical reasons (it works and is true).